Month: March 2018

Amid Opposition, Planning Continues for Obama Presidential Center in Chicago

Just a few miles from the South Side Chicago neighborhood former president Barack Obama called home for nearly a quarter century, he spoke to a mostly supportive audience at McCormick Place Convention Center about his plans to give back to his adopted hometown.

“We’ve got a plan where over the next four years we are going to create $3 billion worth of economic activity.  We are going to create over 5,000 jobs just in the construction, 2,500 jobs that will be permanent and ongoing,” he told the crowd at the start of his latest public meeting about the project.

Though born in Hawaii, raised in Indonesia, and educated in New York City, former president Barack Obama has adopted the city of Chicago, his wife’s birthplace, as his hometown, and the South Side of Chicago is where he got his start in politics as a community organizer in the 1980s, making it a logical location for the facility that will preserve his legacy.  

Current plans for the estimated $300 million Obama Presidential Center place it at historic Jackson Park, designed and developed by the famous landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted in the late 19th century, near Lake Michigan.  The roughly twenty-acre campus would include a variety of different spaces the community could utilize with a large tower looming over the site as the centerpiece, which would house the Obama Presidential Museum.

“It’s estimated we might have as many as 700,000 people just going through the museum portion of this,” Obama explained.  “We are going to be able to make this a jewel not just for the South Side but for the entire city of Chicago.”

‘Tone deaf’

But not everyone on the South Side of Chicago is sold on the project.

“I think over the past year since he was President he has to some extent forgotten the neighborhood where he started out as a community organizer, “ says professor W.J.T. Mitchell who works for Obama’s former employer, the University of Chicago.  Mitchell is one of 200 members of the faculty that recently signed a letter criticizing plans for the Obama Presidential Center at Jackson Park, not far from the University’s campus.

“It has to be shoehorned into a relatively small space that is already highly developed,” Mitchell told VOA from his campus office.  “It’s not adjacent to a commercial strip.  Across the street is a high school and another school associated with the University.  It’s being shoehorned into an already highly developed historic space.”

Mitchell, who would also like to see a “Community Benefits Agreement” with the Obama Foundation guaranteeing certain aspects of the development of the project would benefit the neighboring community, is an unlikely critic as he he considers himself a friend of the Obamas.

“We were part of the same social circle of faculty and neighbors,” he explained.  “We had Thanksgiving dinner with them occasionally.”

Despite that connection, he feels the Obama’s have been “tone deaf” in developing the Presidential Center.  He says despite “breakout sessions” at public meetings, there has not been enough public input.

“There’s no public discussion where the community can say we have real doubts about this aspect,” he says.  “They’ve been marketing it all along, and I think that in itself produced a kind of resistance.  People don’t like being sold under the rubric of ‘we want your input.’”

‘Face-to-face’ meetings urged

Mitchell says he is supportive of the project being located somewhere on the South Side of Chicago, though not Jackson Park, and believes there would be less opposition and concern to the plan if Obama was more present in the neighborhood throughout the development process.

“It would be really great if he would come back and spend some time talking to people face-to-face and not on jumbotrons, and not in huge auditoriums but actually meeting with small groups around the neighborhoods.  He would learn something.”

“What I want to do is make sure that everyone is represented,” Obama explained to the crowd at McCormick Place, and noted he was aware of the many criticisms of the project.  He reiterated his intentions were to ultimately help the residents who live on the South Side.

“We’re not coming in here as a for-profit organization,” he said.  “I’m out there raising a bunch of money to get this thing built… to get this thing up and running, and I’m not taking a salary from the foundation, and Michelle and my motivations are entirely to make sure that the community benefits.”

Benefits that could ultimately transform Chicago’s South Side, which has more recently earned a reputation for its vacant buildings and increased crime… something Obama hopes his Presidential Center can change, which is currently slated for completion – if the plans are approved – sometime in 2021.

 

Pyongyang Warns It Will ‘Counter US’ if It Holds Joint Drills With Seoul

North Korea warned Saturday it would respond if the U.S. holds joint military drills next month with South Korea, contending they would hinder a recent thaw in relations between the two Koreas.

The thaw will be tested when the exercises, which were suspended for the duration of the Winter Olympics in South Korea, start in late March or early April.

A South Korean presidential security adviser said this week the joint exercises are set to begin in early April, according to South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency.

North Korea, whose official name is the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, has repeatedly described the drills as a threat.

“If the U.S. finally holds joint military exercises while keeping sanctions on the DPRK, the DPRK will counter the U.S. by its own mode of counteraction and, the U.S. will be made to own all responsibilities for the ensuing consequences,” North Korea’s official KCNA news agency said in a commentary.

The U.S. announced on February 23 it was imposing its most sweeping set of sanctions on North Korea in an effort to pressure the country to abandon its nuclear and long-range missile development programs.

South Korea plans to send a special envoy to North Korea in response to an invitation from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, South Korean President Moon Jae-in told U.S. President Donald Trump in a phone call Thursday.  

The Olympic Games in Pyeongchang last month presented the two Koreas with the opportunity to engage after tensions between them had escalated over the North’s missile program.

Italian Suspects in Slovak Journalist’s Murder Released

Slovak authorities have released all seven Italians detained Thursday in connection with the murder of an investigative journalist, news website tvnoviny.sk reported Saturday.

The release took place before dawn local time. Charges needed to be brought within the statutory time limit of 48 hours and it is assumed that none were filed, the website reported. Police confirmed the suspects’ release but provided no further details.

The suspects were taken into custody as part of an investigation into the murder of Jan Kuciak, 27, and his girlfriend Martina Kusnirova, who were found shot dead in their home near the capital, Bratislava, last Sunday.

Kuciak was about to publish an article on alleged high-level political corruption connected to the Italian city of Calabria’s notorious ‘Ndrangheta mafia.  

The seven Italian businessmen named by Kuciak in his report, which was published posthumously earlier this week, are Antonino Vadala, 42, Sebastiano Vadala, 45, Bruno Vadala, 40, Diego Roda, 62, Antonio Roda, 58, Pietro C., 26 and Pietro C., 54).

Investigators said Kuciak’s death was “most likely” linked to his reporting.

Thousands attended candlelit anti-corruption protests and memorials held across Slovakia on Friday in reaction to Kuciak’s murder.

Organizers estimated that about 25,000 people gathered in Bratislava, while thousands more paid tribute to Kuciak in other cities and towns across the EU country of 5.4 million people.

Former PM Renzi Warns Italians of Extremist Government

With a day to go before polls open in an Italian election that has been marked by ugly anti-migrant rhetoric and marred by violence, the leader of the center-left Democratic Party and former prime minister Matteo Renzi warned voters that Italy is on the brink of being led by “extremists” and “dangerous populists,” and risks being dragged into a Greek-style economic meltdown.

He said Sunday’s general election will be a choice between those offering growth and those who risk causing economic turmoil. “I say to those who are undecided that this election is much more important than they want to make out; this election is a big divide between those betting on growth and an extremist message,” Renzi said.

“My appeal to the undecided is to think carefully. We ask the Italian people to think carefully,” he said during a live forum organized by Facebook and ANSA, the public press agency.

His opponents in a rightwing alliance led by three-time prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, which includes Forza Italia and Matteo Salvini’s anti-migrant, euro-skeptic Lega, lashed back.

They characterized his remarks as a desperate bid to shore up the vote of the ruling party that’s collapsing in the face of their campaigning and under pressure from the maverick, anti-establishment Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S), which may emerge as the largest single parliamentary party from the election.

Berlusconi’s alliance is likely to secure the largest bloc of parliamentary seats but short of an overall majority, prompting political turmoil and weeks of deal-making to shape a coalition government, predict analysts.

Salvini and Berlusconi have a deal that if the Lega wins more seats than Forza Italia, then Salvini will take the prime minister’s job in any rightwing coalition government that may be formed. Berlusconi, who is barred from holding public office until next year because of a tax fraud conviction, wants his former spokesman Antonio Tajani, currently the president of the European parliament, to be prime minister.

As Renzi delivered his warning, the leaders of CasaPound, an openly neo-fascist stand-alone party, urged followers to back the Lega on Sunday, arguing their votes would strengthen the far-right in Berlusconi’s alliance and help lead to Salvini becoming prime minister.  

“If he [Salvini] takes us out of the euro zone, out of the European Union and blocks immigration, we are ready to support him. Salvini should be premier,” said Simone Di Stefano, the party’s general secretary. He said CasaPound supporters need to understand that if they don’t want to waste their vote, they should vote for the Lega.

CasaPound’s public endorsement in the run-up to voting is being played down by Berlusconi aides and Lega officials, who fear the embrace by open neo-fascists will scare off moderate voters. “It would be better if they remained silent,” said a Berlusconi aide.

Promising a ‘resurrection’

Salvini, who has called for migrants to be cleansed from the streets, has adopted throughout the campaign a complex electoral strategy, seeking to appeal to the far-right, as well as center-right moderates. Midweek at a mass rally in Milan, he swore on the Bible and the Italian Constitution and held up a rosary saying, “I swear to apply what is envisaged by the constitution and I swear to do it according to the teaching in the sacred gospels.”

Calling supporters “apostles,” Salvini asked the Milan audience to go and spread his message, promising, “this Easter will truly be about resurrection.”

The mixing of Catholicism with an uncompromising anti-migrant message earned the rebuke of the Catholic prelates, including the archbishop of Ferrara, Gian Carlo Perego, who accused the 44-year-old Salvini of a “serious exploitation of two important symbols, fundamental to the Christian experience.” The archbishop of Milan, Mario Delpini, added his disapproval, saying “at political rallies one should talk about politics.”

But while seeking the backing of Catholic moderates, Salvini’s call for a widespread migrant expulsion and his outspoken euro-skepticism have resonated with open neo-fascists. Lega candidates in local rallies have made little effort to push away neo-fascist support. The failure of the Lega to distance itself from groups like CasaPound has added to unease among some conservative nationalists in the Berlusconi alliance.

A candidate in the region of Lazio told VOA, “This entanglement unnerves me and other moderate and liberal conservatives; we need clear water between us and those who worship Benito Mussolini, from political forces like CasaPound.”

The right-wing electoral alliance is shot through with personal animosities and distrust. Salvini doesn’t disguise his suspicion publicly that Berlusconi might, in a hung parliament, betray him and seek to run Italy with Renzi by forming a governing coalition consisting of the Lega and the Democratic Party, depending on seat mathematics. “With Berlusconi, you always need to be careful, you need four eyes,” he said Friday.

Bank and rating-agency analysts appear to be betting on a grand governing coalition being formed after Sunday’s polls. In investor advice they have sounded confident about the country’s economic outlook, suggesting that despite the carefree promises of tax cut and increased public spending that most parties have made on the campaign trail, the country’s high public debt will be kept in check and the structural reform efforts of the Democratic Party will continue.

Hung parliament predicted

“Available opinion polls currently point to a hung parliament. While this would cause political uncertainty to persist, we would still see it as market-friendly,” the authors of a BNP Paribas said last month. In their advisory titled “Italy: Bullish view faces near-term risks,” the bank’s analysts argued there was a high probability of a grand coalition being formed, which probably would prevent any sharp, debt-boosting tax cuts being adopted.

The rating agency Moody’s worries about short-term uncertainty. “Short of an M5S-led government, which current opinion polls point as unlikely, the main impact of the election in the short to medium-term may be the uncertainty created, if no coalition is in a clear position to form a government. Such uncertainty may potentially depress the positive consumer and business sentiment that is fueling the current economic growth,” Moody’s said.

The equanimity of the banks isn’t shared by European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, who last week raised Brussels’ alarm about what might unfold in Italy. He made a gloomy forecast of “ungovernability,” warning of a non-operational government emerging, only to retreat in the face of criticism from Rome.

Other EU officials seem to be banking on Berlusconi being able to maintain political stability and order, an ironic bet, as when in office Berlusconi was considered the bete noir of Brussels officials.

While Italy’s election is worrying Brussels, it is delighting former Donald Trump aide Steve Bannon, who arrived in Rome this week to see the campaigning first hand. He told The New York Times, “The Italian people have gone farther, in a shorter period of time, than the British did for Brexit and the Americans did for Trump.”

 

Merkel, Trump Spoke This Week After 5 Months of Silence

Before a phone conversation this week to discuss the war in Syria and Russian nuclear arms, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and U.S. President Donald Trump had not spoken to each other in more than five months.

That gap, described by diplomats on both sides of the Atlantic as shockingly long, underscores the challenge Merkel faces if she succeeds in forming a coalition government later this month and, as German officials suggest, tries to reset the relationship with Trump.

A strong believer in close transatlantic ties, Merkel was the go-to leader in Europe for both Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush when Washington and Berlin were navigating the global financial crisis, Russia’s annexation of Crimea from Ukraine and Iran’s nuclear program.

But her relationship with Trump got off to a frosty start and has never recovered.

Is trust lacking?

At a time of rising transatlantic tensions over trade, the Iran nuclear deal and NATO defense spending, some German officials and analysts worry the personal divide between the brash, impulsive president and cautious, analytical chancellor could lead to a further deterioration in bilateral ties.

Jan Techau, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund think tank in Berlin, described the five month gap as a “very very bad sign.” He saw no connection with the conservative chancellor’s struggle to form a new government more than five months after federal elections.

“I don’t think it has anything to do with the political limbo in Germany. It is a sign of a relationship where there is no trust,” Techau said. “If you don’t have a personal relationship between the leaders to fall back on, it can be very difficult to stop the downward spiral.”

Juergen Hardt, a senior lawmaker in Merkel’s Christian Democrat party, said: “Especially in times of stress, when immediate communication is required, they need to be able to pick up the phone and find solutions. There needs to be a good personal relationship and a good working relationship.”

​In contrast, Macron

German government officials play down the prolonged “radio silence” between Merkel and Trump, noting that the chancellor has ratcheted back her contacts with many foreign leaders during the months of arduous coalition talks at home.

They say the dialogue between Germany and the United States at lower levels of the government remains strong.

Some question whether any foreign leader can influence Trump, who shocked his European allies again Thursday by announcing plans to introduce hefty tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, sending financial markets reeling on fears of a trade war.

“Germany needs to make up for the vacuum at the top level by engaging on other levels, with Congress, with the states and with civil society,” said Thomas Matussek, a former German ambassador to the United Nations and Britain.

Still, the contrast between Merkel’s icy start with Trump and the rapport that French President Emmanuel Macron has developed with the American president is stark.

Macron has gone out of his way to woo Trump with a mix of machismo and flattery. The two engaged in a macho handshake contest when they first met last May. Two months later, Macron hosted Trump at Bastille Day celebrations in Paris, dining with him in the Eiffel Tower.

Next month Macron will travel to Washington for the first official state visit by a foreign leader since Trump became president early last year.

Over the past five months, Macron and Trump have spoken by phone seven times, according to the Elysee. Over the same span, British Prime Minister Theresa May has spoken with Trump four times, according to Downing Street.

U.S. and German officials confirmed to Reuters that before Thursday, Merkel had not spoken with Trump since Sept. 28. She often spoke with Obama and Bush on a weekly basis, according to German officials, who could not recall a gap of more than a month with Trump’s two predecessors.

Public opinion

A French official close to Macron rejected the notion that the French president and Merkel were engaged in a coordinated “good cop, bad cop” act with Trump, and noted that the chancellor had to take her more skeptical public into account.

“German public opinion towards Trump is a catastrophe. It is much more violent (than in France),” the official said.

A poll by the Pew Research Center last year showed that just 11 percent of Germans have confidence in Trump. Another Pew poll published earlier this week showed that 56 percent of Germans view the relationship with the United States as “bad.”

German officials still expect Merkel, who has continued to talk with Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Turkey’s Tayyip Erdogan during times of acute bilateral tensions, to do her best to re-engage with Trump over the coming months.

The two will see each other at a G7 summit in Canada in June and at a NATO summit in Brussels a month later.

U.S.-German contacts may pick up if Merkel finally forms a new government. Social Democrat party members are voting on whether to endorse another four years of the “grand coalition” with the Christian Democrats, with the result of the postal ballot due Sunday.

“Once there is a new government in place, all Cabinet members will engage. Expect a new wave of visits from Berlin to Washington,” one senior official said.

But German officials say there are no current plans for Merkel to return to the White House, where Trump ignored entreaties to shake her hand during a meeting in the Oval Office a year ago. And there are no plans for Trump to return to Germany following his visit to Hamburg for a G20 summit last July.

Putin’s New Nuclear Arsenal Spawning More Tough Talk

Russia is rejecting U.S. accusations it has broken any of its nuclear treaty obligations, arguing it wants only to maintain global peace and stability.

“This should absolutely not be considered a beginning of an arms race,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday.

“These arms are not a threat to anyone who is not planning to attack our country,” he added.

Peskov’s comments come a day after Russian President Vladimir Putin boasted in his annual state of the nation address about his country’s upgraded nuclear weapons arsenal.

Putin said that arsenal included “invincible” nuclear missiles that have unlimited range and which are capable of evading U.S. missile defense systems.

In response, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders accused Russia of “developing destabilizing weapons systems for over a decade in direct violation of its treaty obligations.”

NATO also criticized Russia, calling Putin’s statements “unacceptable and counterproductive.”

“We do not want a new Cold War or a new arms race,” alliance spokesperson Oana Lungescu said in a statement Friday.

“All Allies support arms control agreements which build trust and confidence, for everyone’s benefit,” she said. “We continue to work for more military predictability and transparency.”

Also Friday, Russia’s RIA news agency reported Moscow has delayed planned talks with the U.S., set to focus on strategic stability.

The news agency quoted a Russian Foreign Ministry official as saying the postponement was in response to an earlier decision by Washington to cancel consultations on cybersecurity.

Tensions between Russia and the West have been growing following Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea and its subsequent military buildup.

NATO members have since pledged to increase defense spending and bolster defenses along the alliance’s eastern flank. But Moscow accuses the U.S. and NATO of aiming some of those defense systems, including anti-missile batteries, at Russia.

Both NATO and the U.S. reject that accusation.

Information from Reuters was used for part of this report.

Заблоковано ввезення до України «заборонених» книжок з Росії на 1 мільйон гривень – СБУ

Співробітники Служби безпеки України спільно з митниками заблокували на Сумщині нелегальне ввезення до України книжкової продукції з Росії, йдеться в повідомленні СБУ на сторінці у Facebook.

«Відвантаження друкованої продукції здійснювалось у Москві після оплати та узгодження відповідного переліку видань з боку вітчизняних замовників. Далі комерсанти нелегально переправляли книжки на територію України поза межами пунктів митного контролю. З цією метою ділки приховували «вантаж», зокрема зі зразками антиукраїнського характеру, у пасажирських потягах російської залізниці. Згодом книжки мали потрапити до Києва для подальшої реалізації», – йдеться в повідомленні.

В СБУ повідомили, що склали адміністративні протоколи про порушення митних правил. 

«Згідно з офіційною відповіддю Державного комітету телебачення і радіомовлення України, всі видання, зазначені у переліку вилучених видань, вважаються такими, що ввезені на митну територію України без відповідного дозволу», – зазначили в СБУ.

У травні 2017 року набрала чинності урядова постанова, відповідно до якої розповсюджувачі видавничої продукції з Росії та тимчасово окупованих територій України мають отримувати дозвіл від Держкомтелерадіо на ввезення видавничої продукції. Рішення про відмову у видачі дозволу ухвалює експертна рада.

Розповсюдження російських книг без відповідного дозволу карається штрафами. Водночас громадяни мають право ввозити російські книжки без спеціального дозволу в кількості не більше ніж 10 примірників на людину.

Billy Graham Laid to Rest in North Carolina Hometown

The life of the Reverend Billy Graham was celebrated at his funeral Friday, the culmination of more than a week of tributes to the most charismatic evangelical minister of his generation who conveyed a message of salvation to millions of people.

President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence were among some 2,000 people to attend the private ceremony at the Billy Graham Library in his hometown of Charlotte, North Carolina.

Graham died last week at the age of 99 after more than 60 years of preaching to millions of people at large rallies and tens of millions more on radio and television.

A rare tribute was paid to Graham earlier this week when he became the first religious leader to lie “in honor” at the U.S. Capitol Rotunda in Washington. Only three other civilians have received that distinction.

Graham was to be laid to rest next to his late wife, Ruth, in the library’s prayer garden.

His simple casket was made by inmates at the Louisiana State Prison. The grave marker of “America’s Pastor” — as he was originally called by former president George H.W. Bush — reads: “Preacher of the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Севастопольський лівий активіст Шестакович поскаржився на тортури – адвокат

Заарештований 1 березня лівий активіст з окупованого Росією Севастополя Олексій Шестакович поскаржився на тортури, повідомив 2 березня адвокат Сергій Легостов з посиланням на слова затриманого того ж дня в Севастополі Івана Маркова.

За словами Легостова, Шестакович встиг перед етапуванням в ізолятор тимчасового тримання заявити «про застосування до нього катувань з боку працівників правоохоронних органів, які проводили обшук і затримання».

Інформацію про те, що силовики тримали Шостаковича роздягненим на підлозі, в наручниках,  4 години, поки тривав обшук, підтвердила його мати, Марія Шестакович, яка була присутня під час обшуку.

1 березня в Севастополі відбулися обшуки в будинках лівих активістів Олексія Шестаковича, Олексія Присяжнюка, Ігоря Панюти, Івана Маркова та Артема Воробйова. Активісти припускають, що обшуки пройшли в рамках кримінальної справи, порушеної проти анархіста з Євпаторії Євгенія Каракашева, якого підозрюють в екстремістських висловлюваннях у соціальних мережах.

Після обшуків і затримань 1 березня в анексованому Севастополі Олексія Шестаковича та Івана Маркова заарештували на 10 діб.

Одна людина постраждала внаслідок вибуху в Дніпрі – поліція

У Дніпрі ввечері 2 березня стався вибух, у результаті якого постраждала одна людина. Інформацію про це Радіо Свобода підтвердила речниця обласного управління поліції Ганна Старчевська. 

За її даними, вибух стався близько 19:30 на вулиці в житловому масиві «Тополя». Зараз на місці події працюють слідчо-оперативна група та вибухотехніки. 

Постраждалого внаслідок вибуху доправили до лікарні. Інформацію про його особу поліція не оприлюднює.

Причини вибуху наразі не повідомляються.

Report: Order for Perimeter Came After Florida School Shooting Ended

A sheriff’s office captain told deputies to form a perimeter instead of confronting the gunman at a Florida high school where 17 people were killed in a mass shooting, according to documents obtained by the Miami Herald.

 

The newspaper reported late Thursday that it had obtained a partial Broward Sheriff’s Office dispatch log, which showed that Capt. Jan Jordan gave the order for deputies to establish a perimeter.

 

An earlier report on the call logs published by Fox News showed that the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School would have been over by the time Jordan gave her order.

 

However, the log may raise fresh questions about the department’s handling of the mass shooting on February 14, including whether police could have gone in sooner to help the wounded.

 

 “If detectives had answers to all of the questions, then there would be no need for an investigation,” sheriff’s office spokeswoman Veda Coleman-Wright wrote in an email to the Herald late Thursday.

 

Sheriff Scott Israel has said his office’s training and nationwide active-shooter procedure call for armed law enforcement officers to confront shooters immediately rather than secure a scene. He has blasted Deputy Scot Peterson, the school’s resource officer, for not entering the school building while 19-year-old former student Nikolas Cruz was shooting.

 

Israel told CNN that Coral Springs Police were the first law enforcement officers to enter the building, about four minutes after Cruz left the school.

 

Peterson resigned and has defended his actions.

 

The sheriff’s office has not responded to requests for the logs from The Associated Press. The agency and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement are investigating the actions of officers responding to the shooting.

 

Mafia Influence, Anti-Migrant Fervor in Rural Italy Likely to Impact Elections

The young African couple joined the checkout line in a small supermarket in a town in Campania, Italy’s southwest region famous for a dramatic coastline, ancient ruins, Naples and the Camorra — one of Italy’s top crime mobs. The couple were clutching some basic food items, including milk, bottled water and pasta, and a small plastic bag bulging with change — mostly 1- and 5-cent coins, the proceeds of begging.

Already eyed disdainfully by Italian shoppers, they were met with exasperation and rejection by store clerks when they proffered their money bag to pay. The disdain of the shoppers turned to rage, with shouted calls for the Africans to stop holding up the line and get out.

The Ghanian husband and wife, both in their twenties, one university-educated, who arrived in Italy last year after a hazardous sea crossing from Libya, didn’t leave empty-handed — a fellow shopper, a north European, stepped forward to pay in more manageable money, earning grumbles from others for encouraging the Africans.

Much of the media coverage by metropolitan-based reporters of Italy’s increasingly bad-tempered parliamentary elections has focused on Rome and the northern cities of Milan, Turin and Venice, where the big flag-waving rallies of the 21 competing parties in a sprawling, messy election are taking place.

But a third of Italians don’t live in the big cities or their suburbs, and the voters of small-town and rural Italy will be critical in shaping Sunday’s results.

The minor episode in the coastal supermarket illustrates a deep, seething anti-migrant anger in Campania, one on display daily in incidents large and small, that risks undercutting the vote of Italy’s ruling Democratic Party (PD) in a region where it runs also the regional government.

Campania’s small towns and villages have become ground-zeros when it comes to a migration crisis that has roiled Italian politics, strained the country’s resources and tried the patience — and compassion — of Italians. Locals have become infuriated by the record influx of mainly economic migrants from sub-Saharan African countries.

“Yes, it has become more difficult in recent months,” said Manu, who shrugged off the disdain he encountered when trying to pay for his groceries with a pile of small coins. He says he and his wife made the perilous journey to Italy with the aim of securing jobs somewhere in Europe and improving their lives.

“Italian hearts have hardened,” he said.

Anti-migrant campaigning

Locals acknowledge their attitude indeed has changed because of the sheer numbers of migrants on their streets and their sense of being invaded, as well as the highly public, desperate and mostly Nigerian street prostitution trade on the wind-swept, trash-strewn roads running along the coast north of Naples.

Like much of Italy, anti-migrant fervor has been shaping campaigning in Campania, where the maverick, anti-establishment Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S) is co-opting the votes of the PD by feeding off local anger toward asylum-seekers and blaming the government of Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni for failing to come to grips with the influx and of finding ways to halt it.

It is a region M5S leader Luigi Di Maio, a suave, boyishly telegenic 31-year-old, knows well, having been born and raised in Pomigliano d’Arco, a small municipality on the outskirts of Naples just north of Mount Vesuvius.

Di Maio also knows what arguments to make when trying to counter the campaigning of challenger Silvio Berlusconi’s right-wing coalition made up of the 81-year-old former prime minister’s Forza Italia and three other parties, including Matteo Salvini’s far-right populist Lega, which has called for the mass clean-out of migrants. Di Maio is as uncompromising about migrants but is less specific about what his party will do about them.

The governing PD desperately needs to hang on in the south, especially in the 15 electoral districts of Campania, to avoid a crushing, historic national defeat. PD strategists are hoping the recognizable names of the party’s parliamentary candidates — long-serving politicians well known to the communities — will be enough to stave off electoral humiliation.

But long service brings dangerous baggage.

Mafia mob

Campania is home to one of Italy’s most powerful Mafia mobs, the Camorra, which is enmeshed in the politics of the region. The public image is of a mob that makes most of its money from drugs and prostitution.

But anti-Mafia prosecutors say that while narcotics and sex trafficking are both highly important revenue streams for the Camorra, the big money is made in public-sector fraud, construction contracts and waste management. The longer the public service, the more likely a politician has had to make deals with the mobsters, public prosecutors tell VOA.

As the election has unfolded in Campania, politically damaging leaks about police probes into PD politicians have multiplied — the most embarrassing for the party involving an investigation into the son of regional Governor Vincenzo De Luca. The governor claims the whole thing is a setup. Nonetheless, in such a tight election the news of the police probe could have a major impact.

“Campania is the Ohio of Italy,” said Paolo Russo, a center-right politician. He argues the greatest risk for Berlusconi and his electoral alliance, which has been pushing a plan for major tax cuts, is that the PD vote collapses to well below 20 percent, which he believes could benefit M5S and ensure the maverick upstart emerges from the voting as the largest single parliamentary party, preventing the right-wing electoral alliance led by Forza Italia from securing an overall parliamentary majority.

In short, Berlusconi’s alliance needs the PD to do poorly, but not too poorly. A few hundred votes either way in Campania could make all the difference nationally.

And such a tight race raises the question of the Camorra. Vote-buying, regardless of party affiliation, is a habitual practice in Campania, prompting Italy’s interior minister, Marco Minniti, to question the outsize dangers that poses.

“There is a concrete risk of the Mafias disrupting electors’ free vote,” Minniti said last week as he presented an annual report to the Anti-Mafia Commission in Rome. “The Mafias are able to shape institutions and politics.”

Moldova, Georgia, Ukraine Decry Russian Presence

Leaders from Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia have criticized the presence of Russian troops in their countries saying they are a destabilizing presence in the three ex-Soviet republics.

The parliamentary speakers from the three countries issued a joint statement Friday saying they were “profoundly concerned about Russian troops” in Moldova “and Russian occupation and other forms of military intervention,” in parts of Georgia and Ukraine.

The statement at the end of a one-day security conference in Moldova’s capital, Chisinau, also expressed displeasure at “coordinated foreign support for separatist movements,” and social media “operations” to discredit their pro-European governments.

It said the governments should enhance their capability to counter hybrid attacks and called on the European Union and U.S. to support them.

NATO Rejects Putin’s ‘Unacceptable’ Threats to Target Allies

NATO says Russian President Vladimir Putin’s threat to target its members are unacceptable and that the military alliance will continue using its armed forces to deter aggression.

 

NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu said Friday that “Russian statements threatening to target allies are unacceptable and counterproductive.”

 

Putin said Thursday that Moscow has tested an array of new strategic nuclear weapons that can’t be intercepted, telling the West: “You have failed to contain Russia.”

 

Lungescu said NATO’s missile defense system is built to respond to attacks from outside Europe and North America and not directed against Russia.

 

Noting Russia’s “aggressive actions” in Ukraine and military buildup around Europe, she said: “NATO is pursuing a twin-track approach to Russia: strong deterrence and defense, combined with meaningful dialogue.”

 

US Markets Fall on Steel, Aluminum Tariffs Announcement

Stocks are turning sharply lower in afternoon trading as talk of steep tariffs on steel and aluminum spook investors.

The Dow Jones industrial average dropped as much as 500 points Thursday.

Industrial companies that would take a hit from higher steel and aluminum prices fell sharply.

Heavy equipment maker Caterpillar fell 2 percent and aerospace giant Boeing gave back 4 percent.

Big exporters like Apple and drugmaker Pfizer, which would suffer if trade tensions picked up, also fell.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 index dropped 41 points, or 1.5 percent, to 2,671. The benchmark index is coming off its worst month in two years.

The Dow was down 470 points, or 19 percent, at 24,554. The Nasdaq composite fell 127 points, or 1.8 percent, to 7,142.

This is a breaking story; please check back for updates.

Україна брутально атакує нацменшини – МЗС Угорщини про рішення КСУ щодо «мовного закону»

В Україні «розпочали брутальну атаку» проти національних меншин, про що свідчить рішення КСУ щодо невідповідності Конституції закону «про засади державної мовної політики», заявив 1 березня міністр закордонних справ Угорщини Петер Сійярто.

«Український уряд поставив перед собою два націоналістичні завдання – перше: щоб нацменшини не могли вчитися, друге: щоб не мали можливості розмовляти рідною мовою», – сказав Сійярто.

На думку урядовця, ознаками того, що нацменшини «стали мішенню» є події довкола «мовного закону», а також підпалу офісу Товариства угорської культури на Закарпатті.

«А зараз скасовують закон, який забезпечує можливість, щоб нацменшини могли вживати власну мову. У правовій державі не відбуваються речі, які мають місце в Україні», – сказав Сійярто.

Він заявив, що в так званому «законі Ківалова-Колесніченка» допустима межа вживання мови нацменшин починалася з десяти відсотків, а в новому законопроекті депутати «хочуть прив’язати до 33-х відсотків», сказав Сійярто.

«Останні події зміцнили позицію Угорщини, що вона не підтримуватиме євроатлантичних зусиль Києва, доки не буде налагоджено ситуацію із правами нацменшин», – додав він.

Раніше сьогодні голова Верховної Ради України Андрій Парубій запропонував ухвалити новий закон про мову, заявивши, що в парламент подані кілька тематичних законопроектів.

Ухвалений за президентства Віктора Януковича у 2012 році закон «Про засади державної мовної політики» передбачав запровадження офіційної двомовності в регіонах, де чисельність національних меншин перевищує 10 відсотків. Верховна Рада України проголосувала за скасування «мовного закону» ще у лютому 2014 року, однак президент досі не підписав і не ветував законопроект про це, відтак закон далі чинний.

28 лютого Конституційний суд України визнав закон «про засади державної мовної політики», так званий «закон Колесніченка-Ківалова», неконституційним.

Росія: продюсер «Дождя» звинуватила депутата Думи Слуцького в домаганнях

Продюсер російського телеканалу «Дождь» Дар’я Жук звинуватила депутата Державної думи Росії від ЛДПР Леоніда Слуцького в домаганнях. Її звернення оприлюднили на сайті телеканалу.

«Ось уже кілька днів ви з дивовижною завзятістю заперечуєте вашу провину. Історії дівчат, моїх колег, які постраждали від ваших домагань, називаєте маячнею. Мовляв, це все передвиборна провокація, а історії-то анонімні, хто їм повірить? Ну що ж, Леоніде Едуардовичу, доведеться виходити з тіні. Одна з трьох дівчат, які розповіли на умовах анонімності про ваші домагання, – це я», – заявила Жук.

Вона згадала, що восени 2014 року запрошувала Слуцького на ефір і тоді він поводив себе «цілком пристойно».

«Але потім, коли почала вас кликати вже в іншу програму, ви «тикали», непристойно жартували і відповідали, що прийдете в студію, тільки якщо я піду з вами на вечерю. Я не реагувала, і, треба віддати вам належне, на ефір ви все-таки прийшли. Як тільки ви зайшли в студію, ви майже відразу ж проявили себе – силою намагалися мене поцілувати, намагалися чіпати, вели себе грубо і настирливо», – зазначила Жук.

Продюсер розповіла, що їй було «неприємно і страшно», і тому вона попросила свого колегу провести депутата на ефір.

«Тепер у мене до вас тільки одне питання: ви і зараз будете все заперечувати? Дивно, що знаходяться депутати, які лякають позбавленням акредитації журналістів, які просто розповіли правду, замість того, щоб провести чесне розслідування. Сьогодні я відправила лист на ім’я голови комісії Держдуми з етики Отарі Аршби і сподіваюся, що ви понесете справедливе покарання», – заявила Жук.

22 лютого телеканал «Дождь» повідомив із посиланням на трьох журналісток, які працюють у російському парламенті, про сексуальні домагання до них із боку голови комітету з міжнародних справ Держдуми, депутата від ЛДПР Леоніда Слуцького. Одна зі співрозмовниць «Дождя» пояснила, що не хотіла розголосу, оскільки боїться, що не зможе більше працювати в Держдумі.

Сам Слуцький заперечує звинувачення. У розмові з російським виданням РБК він назвав повідомлення про те, що він домагався журналісток, «маячнею». Лідер ЛДПР Володимир Жириновський пообіцяв перевірити ці повідомлення, підкресливши, що не вважає таку поведінку нормальною.

Водночас заступник голови нижньої палати російського парламенту Ігор Лебедєв заявив, що фракція ЛДПР поставить питання про позбавлення акредитації журналістів телеканалу «Дождь».

«Ми повністю готові»: у Пентагоні заявили, що не здивовані заявою Путіна про ядерну зброю

У Міністерстві оборони США заявили, що не здивовані заявами російського президента Володимира Путіна про нову ядерну зброю. Як заявила речниця Пентагону Дана Вайт, військові США готові захищати свою країну.

«Ми не здивовані заявами, і американський народ має бути певен, що ми повністю підготовлені», – сказала Вайт.

Вона додала, що системи протиракетної оборони США в Європі не орієнтовані на Росію, а призначені головним чином для захисту від загроз з боку Ірану, Північної Кореї та інших злісних загроз.

Раніше сьогодні у своєму посланні Федеральним зборам президент Росії Володимир Путін заявив, що у Росії розроблена малогабаритна надпотужна ядерна енергоустановка для крилатої ракети, яка буде невразливою для систем протиракетної оборони. Путін заявив, що такі «недружні кроки стосовно Росії, як розгортання системи ПРО», до кордонів з Росією «стають неефективними».

16 лютого генеральний секретар НАТО Єнс Столтенберґ закликав Росію бути «відкритою» в питанні дотримання договору між СРСР та США в 1987 році про ліквідацію ракет середньої та малої дальності (INF).

Тоді ж він заявив, що хоча ціль НАТО – «це світ без ядерної зброї», Альянс продовжить залишатися ядерним блоком. Він пояснив, що «світ, де Росія, Китай та Північна Корея мають ядерну зброю, але НАТО не має, це небезпечний світ».

Supremacist Who Bought Gun for Planned Church Attack Pleads Guilty

A white supremacist faces up to 10 years in prison for illegally buying a gun authorities say he planned to use in a hate crime attack similar to the South Carolina church shootings.

Benjamin McDowell, 30, pleaded guilty Monday to being a felon in possession of a weapon, according to reports by multiple news outlets. He also could be fined $250,000 when he’s sentenced at a later date.

Authorities first began investigating McDowell in December 2016 when he threatened a Myrtle Beach synagogue on Facebook. Local officials were already keeping tabs on him because he made friends with white supremacists groups and got tattoos associated with racist groups while in prison on a felony burglary charge, according to the FBI.

McDowell then said he wanted a gun and told an undercover FBI agent who offered to get him one that he planned to attack somewhere in the name of white power and write on the building “in the spirit of Dylann Roof,” according to court records. Roof was sentenced to death last year for a racist shooting that killed nine black worshippers at a Charleston, South Carolina, church.

“I seen what Dylann Roof did and in my heart I reckon I got a little bit of hatred,” the undercover agent recalled McDowell saying.

McDowell, who couldn’t legally own a gun because of the burglary conviction, was arrested after the purchase. Agents said McDowell bought the gun — which had the firing pin shaved down so that it would not work — and ammunition for $109, which he had borrowed from his grandfather.

UK Scraps Plans for New Inquiry into Media Wrongdoing

The British government has scrapped plans for an inquiry into alleged media law-breaking and relations between journalists and the police.

 

Britain held a year-long, judge-led inquiry into press “culture and practices” after the 2011 revelation that employees of the now-defunct News of the World tabloid had hacked the mobile-phone voicemails of celebrities, politicians and crime victims.

 

At the time the government said there would be a second phase, looking at “unlawful or improper conduct” within media organizations and their relations with the police.

 

But successive Conservative-led governments delayed acting on the promise. Culture Secretary Matt Hancock said Thursday that reopening the “costly and time-consuming” inquiry was not the right thing to do.

 

Labour Party culture spokesman Tom Watson called the decision “a bitter blow to the victims of press intrusion.”

 

 

US Will Impose Steep Steel, Aluminum Tariffs Next Week

President Donald Trump says the United States will impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports next week.

At a meeting Thursday with top executives from U.S. steel and aluminum companies, he announced tafiffs of 25 percent on steel products and 10 percent on aluminum.

Trump said in a Twitter post Thursday morning that “Our Steel and Aluminum industries (and many others) have been decimated by decades of unfair trade and bad policy with countries from around the world.” He continued, “We must not let our country, companies and workers be taken advantage of any longer. We want free, fair and SMART TRADE!”

 

The Trump administration has shown its desire to impose tariffs on various metal imports since last year.

Earlier this month, the Commerce Department announced that it found “the quantities and circumstances of steel and aluminum imports threaten to impair national security.”

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross recommended that President Trump impose a tariff of at least 53 percent on all steel imports from China and 11 other countries, and a tariff of 23.6 percent on all aluminum products from China, Hong Kong, Russia, Venezuela and Vietnam.

 

On Thursday China’s top economic advisor Liu He is scheduled to visit the White House to meet with top administration officials, including Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Trump’s chief economic advisor Gary Cohn.

A White House official speaking on condition of anonymity told Reuters that they expect a “frank exchange of views” and will focus on “the substantive issues.”

Ryan L. Hass, David M. Rubenstein Fellow at John L. Thornton China Center and the Center for East Asia Policy Studies at Brookings Institution told VOA he believes in the best case scenario, Liu’s visit will assure both sides that “they are committed to solving underlying problems in the bilateral trade relationship.”

Hass noted, “In such a scenario, both sides would agree on the problems that need to be addressed, the framework for addressing them, and the participants and timeline for concluding negotiations.”

Hass said if Liu He’s visit fails to exceed the White House’s expectations, then the probability of unilateral U.S. trade actions against China will go up. “If the U.S. takes unilateral actions, China likely will respond proportionately, and that could set off a tit-for-tat cycle leading to a trade war,” he said.

Benin Leader’s Visit Is France’s First Test on Returning African Art Treasures

In the 19th century, the Kingdom of Dahomey was a major West African power, boasting a flourishing slave trade with Europe and a feared corps of Amazon women warriors. Commissioned by the royal court, its art — intricate wood and ivory carvings, metalwork and appliqué cloth — stood as a potent symbol of the kingdom’s might.

But by 1894, Dahomey was annexed by France after a pair of brutal wars. Its artifacts ended up in French museums and private collections.

Now modern-day Benin, the seat of the former Dahomey kingdom, may have the best chance to date of getting them back, as French President Emmanuel Macron vows to make the return of treasures from former African colonies a top priority. That vow will be tested next week, when Benin President Patrice Talon visits France. Restitution of Dahomey artifacts is expected to rank high in (March 6) discussions between the two leaders.

“The question is to give back what has been stolen during the worst conditions of war,” said Marie-Cecile Zinsou, daughter of Benin’s former prime minister and president of the Zinsou Foundation, an organization in the main city, Cotonou,  that promotes African art.

“It’s very small for France, but for us it’s everything,” she said of the roughly 5,000 artifacts Benin wants back. “We have nothing left in Benin — we have copies, but no original trace of our history.”

Made during a November speech in Burkina Faso’s capital, Ouagadougou, Macron’s restitution promise has been described as historic and even revolutionary. Over the next five years, he said, the conditions must be met ‘for the temporary or permanent restitution of African heritage to Africa.”

“African heritage can’t just be in European private collections and museums,” Macron said. “African heritage must be highlighted in Paris, but also in Dakar, in Lagos, in Cotonou.”

Experts believe that if realized, France’s example may prove the tipping point for other former colonial powers, similarly pressured by restitution claims. But while much of Africa’s cultural heritage lies outside the continent — stolen, sold or otherwise expatriated by European soldiers, missionaries and Africans themselves — returning it lays bare a tangle of difficult questions.

Who should receive artifacts that may have changed hands and borders many times over the years? Should private collections, as well as national museums be compelled to return the treasures? And would those returns be permanent or temporary? In France, repatriation may also demand changing current law that recognizes the artifacts as inalienable cultural heritage.  

Skeptics argue that many African countries lack national museums or other spaces capable of housing old and fragile artifacts. And apart from a handful of exceptions like Benin, some say, few governments have mounted strong restitution campaigns.  

“All these countries have so many problems to solve that it’s not been the priority,” according to Corinne Hershkovitch, a French lawyer specializing in the restitution of cultural goods. “But it has be be a priority if you want to make cultural heritage come back to your country.”

Others say restitution discussions are taking place outside the media spotlight. Many agree returning African art will demand creative ways of thinking and pooling resources.

“The debate has started in France,” said Mechtild Rössler, director of UNESCO’s World Heritage Center. “Museums now need to look at their own collection and identify pieces, which may have been trafficked illegally, or which may have come out of some dubious circumstances during colonialism. It’s part of reviewing the whole colonial history.”

The debate also heating is up in other European countries, which collectively house several hundred thousand African artefacts.  That includes in Germany, where Berlin’s museum chief wants to draw up international museum guidelines for the repatriation of African artefacts — similar to those created for the return of Nazi-confiscated art.

In Britain, Cambridge University students are calling for a bronze cockerel on the university campus to be returned to Nigeria. It is among hundreds of ‘Benin bronzes’ looted during colonial days whose return will be discussed by European museums during a meeting this year. Restitution also will be on the menu at yet another conference being organized in Brazzaville.

“It’s a matter of justice and culture, but it’s also a matter of business,” said Louis-Georges Tin, head of CRAN, an umbrella group of black French associations that helped spearhead some of the repatriation demands. “You cannot do business with African countries and be a robber at the same time.”

For African countries, repatriating the artefacts carries another powerful economic argument, since they can  attract sought-after tourism revenue. “Museums can be the first entry point to learn about the history and culture of these countries,” said UNESCO’s Rossler. “But there must also be different explanations than those given in Europe.”

Beyond restituting African artifacts, Rossler also said Europe could help African countries to house them.

“I have seen museums in Africa where this is absolutely possible,” she said, adding that in other cases, the European Union or individual countries may offer financing.

In France, the public Quai Branly Museum, which houses most of the country’s colonial-era African artifacts, says it is open to restitution demands — providing proper conditions and political will exist.

“We don’t return objects just to heal wounds,” Quai Branly’s president, Stephane Martin, told Paris Match magazine. “The people who receive them must have a real desire to do something with them.”

Others argue African countries should be making those calls.

“It’s our problem what to do with our heritage,” said Zinsou of the Benin foundation. “It’s not a question of France telling us what to do.”

In 2016, Benin became the first sub-Saharan African country demanding that France return its artifacts, arguing they were important both culturally and economically. But last year, the previous French government rejected that request, arguing the pieces now were legally French property. If the Macron administration gives the green light, it may demand changing French law.

“I hope Benin will show what is possible,” Zinsou said. “Even if you’re a poor country, you can [repatriate artifacts] properly.”

Restitution questions also are roiling private galleries and auction houses. But at his office near the Seine River, Paris gallery owner Robert Vallois is serene.

“The doors are open for discussion among people of good will,” he said.

Vallois and group of local gallery owners have offered one answer to the debate. In 2015, they opened a small museum in Benin that exhibits art donated from their own collections.

“Is it a national treasure for France, or is it a national treasure for Africa?” Vallois asked. “Both. The problem is to show it to the people.”

New Arms Race? Putin Boasts of High-Tech Weaponry

On one level it was the kind of speech an incumbent leader seeking reelection would give, offering material improvements, making economic promises, and pledging to create more jobs and build better houses.  

Delivering his annual state of the nation address Thursday, his 14th and the last one he will make before an election on March 18 he’s expected to win easily, Russian President Vladimir Putin said his “top priority is to preserve the people of Russia and improve their welfare,” adding that it was “unacceptable” that 20 million Russians are living below the official poverty line.

What grabbed international attention, however, wasn’t his pledge to spend more on maternity pay, hospitals and childcare as well as urban development and education, but his highlighting in bold language Russia’s military buildup under his leadership and his focus, especially on the country’s nuclear strength.

Putin’s surprise announcement of the development of a new cruise missile that he claims can’t be intercepted by the U.S. air-defense shield in Europe and Asia, and of a new, heavy payload intercontinental missile, risks upending strategic stability and triggering a new arms race, according to former Swedish prime minister Carl Bildt.

“If there was wisdom in the world there would now be a new phase of strategic stability talks between the U.S. and Russia followed by concrete agreements,” tweeted a clearly worried Bildt.

Former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul also argued it is time to restart arms control negotiations. “Putin’s announcement today about his new nuclear weapons aimed at us should be a wake up call to Trump,” he tweeted. He said the unveiling of the new super-weapons may not be a return to the Cold War, “but most certainly is a Hot Peace.”

‘Wake-up call’

Former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul also argued it is time to restart arms control negotiations. “Putin’s announcement today about his new nuclear weapons aimed at us should be a wake up call to Trump,” he tweeted.

Mc Faul added the unveiling of the new super-weapons may not be a return to the Cold War, “but most certainly is a Hot Peace.”

Of the new super-weapons unveiled by Putin, the innovative cruise missile stands out as a possible game-changer. Putin described it as “low-flying, difficult-to-spot” and “with a nuclear payload with a practically unlimited range and an unpredictable flight path, which can bypass lines of interception and is invincible in the face of all existing and future systems of both missile defense and air defense.”

His showcasing of a range of new nuclear-related weapons, including a submarine-launched nuclear-armed underwater drone, was accompanied by video presentations and computer images of the new weapons speeding toward the United States. The videos were shown on large screens in the conference hall full of enthusiastic Russian lawmakers and officials.

The speech’s venue had been shifted in a clear signal that the Kremlin wanted to attract more attention. Normally, Putin delivers his annual state of the nation speech in the gilded St. George’s Hall in the Kremlin complex.  This time, it was transferred to an exhibition hall in central Moscow, where video and animations of speeding missiles could be shown.

They will strike “like a meteorite, like a fireball,” Putin said dryly in his most forceful declaration yet of Russia’s military might and nuclear strength. “Russia remained a nuclear power, but no one wanted to listen to us. Listen to us now,” Putin said after announcing the super-weapons.

‘Moment of truth’

“Giving half the time in the annual address to the Russian parliament to a graphic description of new weapons’ capabilities is a measure of how close the U.S. and Russia have moved toward military collision,” tweeted Dmitri Trenin, director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, a think tank.

As the speech unfolded, former Putin adviser Gleb Pavlovsky said, “The old man only brightened up when talking about how he can destroy the whole world. A moment of truth!”

Why Putin decided to announce a new arms race now has left analysts divided.

Some say it has to be seen as part of the Russian leader’s electioneering.

While he remains highly popular, according to opinion polls, the Kremlin is worried about voter turnout, and opposition activists say Putin’s aides are worried as they try to balance between keeping tight control over campaigning and avoiding voter apathy. The Kremlin, they say, is determined to ensure a big turnout to demonstrate that Putin remains Russia’s “irreplaceable leader” 18 years after first coming to power, and that his grip on the nation hasn’t weakened.

The country’s only truly independent opposition leader, anti-corruption campaigner Alexei Navalny, has been excluded from running. He is urging supporters to boycott the polls to try to depress the vote.

‘You have failed to contain Russia’

In a bid to boost his popularity, Putin has presented himself before as the kind of decisive leader Russia needs to protect itself. He outlined again on Thursday the narrative of a Russia under siege. “I want to tell all those who have fueled the arms race over the last 15 years, sought to win unilateral advantages over Russia, introduced unlawful sanctions aimed to contain our country’s development: all what you wanted to impede with your policies has already happened,” Putin said. “You have failed to contain Russia.”

The nuclear-missile developments Putin has been pushing pre-date this election. They began more than a decade ago, after Putin complained bitterly about the U.S. withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002 and its deployment of missile defense installations in Romania and Poland.

The Kremlin has long feared that defensive systems capable of intercepting Russian missiles would open the way for Western enemies to launch a first strike against Russia.

The roots of this fear go back to the early 1980s, when Soviet intelligence agencies were convinced that the U.S. was preparing to launch a surprise nuclear attack against what was then the Soviet Union and its allies. The war scare was revealed subsequently by high-ranking Soviet intelligence defector Oleg Gordievsky, who in a later book described his intelligence bosses as being in the grip of paranoia. He said it reflected genuine fears by Soviet leaders, who misread then U.S. president Ronald Reagan’s tough rhetoric against the USSR as a prelude to war.

The Soviet intelligence agency, the KGB, launched Operation RYAN, and ordered overseas agents and assets to scoop up any information they could and act as a collective early warning system of a possible U.S.-launched first strike. This even involved deploying spotters at night to park near the Pentagon to see if more office lights were switched on than usual.

Much of Operation RYAN’s early warning focus was on Germany, where KGB agents in the Communist half of the country were under pressure to find evidence of America’s malign intention to attack.

Among those officers was a young Vladimir Putin.

 

Loading...
X