Month: October 2017

Amnesty’s Kilic to Remain Behind Bars in Turkey

Amnesty International’s country chairman in Turkey is to remain in custody on terrorism charges related to the use of a phone app, the human rights group said.

Amnesty announced the Turkish court’s decision to keep chairman Taner Kilic behind bars in its Twitter feed, saying it “won’t stop until he is free.”

Kilic has been in prison for five months, facing up to 15 years in prison for downloading ByLock, a popular encrypted messaging app.

Turkish authorities say the messaging app is used by supporters of Fetullah Gulen, a U.S.-based cleric whom Turkey blames for a failed coup attempt last summer. Gulen repeatedly has denied any involvement in the coup plot, though Ankara maintains he masterminded the unsuccessful overthrow.

Turkey’s Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that simply downloading the messaging app to one’s phone was evidence a person belonged to a terrorist group.

Kilic is on trial with 10 of his colleagues from Amnesty’s Turkish division. The charges relate to a digital security workshop organized by the group.

Amnesty’s European director, John Dalhuisen, called the trial “an acid test for the Turkish justice system” and said it will demonstrate whether human rights activism “has now become a crime in Turkey.”

“From the moment of their detentions, it has been clear that these are politically motivated prosecutions aimed at silencing critical voices within Turkey,” he said in a statement.

Toxins in Widespread Use Excluded US Agency’s Chemical Review

Spurred by the chemical industry, President Donald Trump’s administration is retreating from a congressionally mandated review of some of the most dangerous chemicals in public use: millions of tons of asbestos, flame retardants and other toxins in homes, offices and industrial plants across the United States.

 

Instead of following president Barack Obama’s proposal to look at chemicals already in widespread use that result in some of the most common exposures, the new administration wants to limit the review to products still being manufactured and entering the marketplace.

 

For asbestos, that means gauging the risks from just a few hundred tons of the material imported annually – while excluding almost all of the estimated 8.9 million tons (8.1 million metric tons) of asbestos-containing products that the U.S. Geological Survey said entered the marketplace between 1970 and 2016.

 

The review was intended to be the first step toward enacting new regulations to protect the public. But critics – including health workers, consumer advocates, members of Congress and environmental groups – contend ignoring products already in use undermines that goal.

 

The administration’s stance is the latest example of Trump siding with industry. In this case, firefighters and construction workers say the move jeopardizes their health.

 

Both groups risk harm from asbestos because of its historical popularity in construction materials ranging from roofing and flooring tiles to insulation used in tens of millions of homes. Most of the insulation came from a mine in a Montana town that’s been declared a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund site and where hundreds of people have died from asbestos exposure.

 

“Hundreds of thousands of firefighters are going to be affected by this. It is by far the biggest hazard we have out there,” said Patrick Morrison, assistant general president for health and safety at the International Association of Fire Fighters. “My God, these are not just firefighters at risk. There are people that live in these structures and don’t know the danger of asbestos.”

The EPA told The Associated Press on Wednesday that there were measures to protect the public other than the law Congress passed last year, which mandated the review of asbestos and nine other chemicals to find better ways to manage their dangers. For example, workers handling asbestos and emergency responders can use respirators to limit exposure, the agency said in a statement.

 

Asbestos fibers can become deadly when disturbed in a fire or during remodeling, lodging in the lungs and causing problems including mesothelioma, a form of cancer. The material’s dangers have long been recognized. But a 1989 attempt to ban most asbestos products was overturned by a federal court, and it remains in widespread use.

 

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health analyzed cancer-related deaths among 30,000 firefighters from Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco. The 2015 study concluded firefighters contract mesothelioma at twice the rate of other U.S. residents.

 

Firefighters also face exposure to flame retardants included in the EPA’s review that are used in furniture and other products.

 

“I believe the chemical industry is killing firefighters,” said Tony Stefani, a former San Francisco fireman who retired in 2003 after 28 years when diagnosed with cancer he believes resulted from exposure to chemicals in the review.

 

Stefani said he was one of five in his station to contract cancer in a short period. Three later died, while Stefani had a kidney removed and endured a year of treatment before being declared cancer-free.

 

“When I entered the department in the early 70s, our biggest fear was dying in the line of duty or succumbing to a heart attack,” he said. “Those were the biggest killers, not cancer. But we work in a hazardous-materials situation every time we have a fire now.”

Mesothelioma caused or contributed to more than 45,000 deaths nationwide between 1999 and 2015, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study in March. The number of people dying annually from the disease increased about 5 percent during that time.

 

In one of its last acts under Obama, the EPA said in January it would judge the chemicals “in a comprehensive way” based on their “known, intended and reasonably foreseen uses.”

 

Under Trump, the agency has aligned with the chemical industry, which sought to narrow the review’s scope. The EPA now says it will focus only on toxins still being manufactured and entering commerce. It won’t consider whether new handling and disposal rules are needed for “legacy,” or previously existing, materials.

 

“EPA considers that such purposes generally fall outside of the circumstances Congress intended EPA to consider,” said EPA spokeswoman Enesta Jones, adding the agency lacks authority to regulate noncommercial uses of the chemicals.

 

One of the law’s co-authors, New Mexico Democratic Sen. Tom Udall, disputes that Congress wanted to limit the review.

 

“It doesn’t matter whether the dangerous substance is no longer being manufactured; if people are still being exposed, then there is still a risk,” Udall told AP. “Ignoring these circumstances would openly violate the letter and the underlying purpose of the law.”

 

Democrats and public health advocates have criticized EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt for installing people with longstanding ties to the chemical industry into senior positions at the agency. On Wednesday, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, on a party-line vote, advanced the nomination of Michael Dourson, a toxicologist whose work has been paid for by the industry, to oversee the EPA’s chemical safety program.

 

Two prior appointments worked for the American Chemistry Council, the industry’s lobbying arm: Nancy Beck, deputy assistant administrator for chemical safety, and Liz Bowman, the associate administrator for public affairs.

 

The council pushed back against the Obama administration’s interpretation of the law, urging the EPA’s new leadership to narrow its review. The Trump administration did that in June.

 

“Did we get everything we wanted? No. But we certainly agree the [Trump] administration put forth a reasonable final rule,” said council vice president Michael Walls. Broadening the review, he added, would send the EPA “down a rabbit hole chasing after illusory risks.”

 

The politically influential National Association of Homebuilders, which represents the residential construction industry, fears broadly interpreting the new law would lead to burdensome regulations that are unnecessary because it says asbestos disposal rules already are adequate.

 

Many of those regulations are based on a 1994 Occupational Safety and Health Administration finding that materials had to contain at least 1 percent asbestos to qualify for regulation. But public health experts say the 1 percent threshold is arbitrary.

 

“It’s bad medicine, and it’s harmful,” said Michael Harbut, an internal medicine professor at Detroit’s Wayne State University and medical adviser to an insulation workers’ union.

 

“There’s still a lot of asbestos out there,” said Harbut, who helped establish criteria used by physicians to diagnose and treat asbestos-related diseases. “It’s still legal, it’s still deadly, and it’s going to be a problem for decades to come.”

New US Study: Compromise Health Law Changes Would Have Little Effect

A bipartisan measure to stabilize the U.S. health insurance markets would save the government money, but do little to cut the cost of premiums for consumers or substantially change the number of people who have insurance to help pay their medical bills, a new independent study concluded Wednesday.

With Republican efforts stalled in Congress to dismantle national health policies championed by former President Barack Obama, two senators, Republican Lamar Alexander and Democrat Patty Murray, reached an accord to keep markets for individual insurance buyers from collapsing.

Good news, bad news

In the new analysis, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said the compromise crafted by Alexander and Murray would cut the government’s deficit by $3.8 billion over the next decade, but “would not substantially change the number of people with health insurance coverage.” The CBO earlier said the Republican replacement plans would have cut 20 million or more people from insurance rolls.

While there is bipartisan support for the Alexander-Murray compromise in the Senate, Republican leaders who control the congressional legislative agenda have yet to commit that there will be a vote on it. Republicans have tried dozens of times over the past seven years, all unsuccessfully, to repeal the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare. Their latest attempts to undermine the law failed in several key votes earlier this year.

However, key legislative leaders say the Alexander-Murray health care changes could be added to other measures that lawmakers will be debating as current government funding expires in early December.

Limited support

President Donald Trump has voiced some support for the Alexander-Murray pact, but said he wants other changes to curb payments to insurance companies as compensation for their providing lower-cost policies to poorer Americans.

About 20 million people who previously had no health insurance have gained coverage under Obamacare, but Republicans have long viewed the law as government overreach, chiefly because it requires virtually all Americans to buy insurance or pay a fine if they do not.

Most American workers get their health insurance coverage through their employers, while the government pays for much of the coverage for older and poorer people.

Individuals who buy their own insurance are most affected by the debate over the fate of Obamacare.

Посол України в Австрії отримав 380 тисяч гривень зарплати в жовтні – #Точно

Посол України в Австрії Олександр Щерба в жовтні отримав 380 108 гривень заробітної плати. Така інформація міститься в Єдиному державному реєстрі декларацій осіб, уповноважених на виконання функцій держави або місцевого самоврядування, повідомляє #Точно, проект Радіо Свобода.

Олександр Щерба був призначений надзвичайним і повноважним послом України в Австрії 17 листопада 2014 року. До того він обіймав посади в департаменті Європейського союзу в Міністерстві закордонних справ України (2008–2009 роки), згодом працював радником кандидата на посаду президенти України Арсенія Яценюка (2009–2010 роки). У 2010–2013 роках Щерба працював послом з особливих доручень Міністерства закордонних справ України. Після того був радником першого віце-прем’єр-міністра України Сергія Арбузова, беручи участь у переговорах із Міжнародним валютним фондом та Європейським союзом стосовно підготовки до підписання Угоди про асоціацію.

У своїй щорічній декларації Олександр Щерба зазначив наявність двох квартир у столиці, коштовного годинника Cartier, легкового автомобіля Mazda CX-7 (2008 року випуску), а також понад 1,5 мільйона гривень зарплатні у 2016 році. Окрім цього, в посла на банківському рахунку є 50 000 євро і 15 000 гривень.

А от посол України в Туреччині Андрій Сибіга в жовтні отримав майже 175 тисяч гривень заробітної плати разом із компенсаційними витратами. Цю інформацію можна знайти в Єдиному державному реєстрі декларацій осіб, уповноважених на виконання функцій держави або місцевого самоврядування.

А у квітні посол України у США Валерій Чалий отримав трохи більше ніж 200 тисяч гривень заробітної плати разом із компенсаційними витратами.

Hurricane Maria Recovery Highlights Puerto Rico Inequalities

Hurricane Maria didn’t discriminate between rich and poor when it ravaged Puerto Rico, but the recovery has been another story.

Much of Puerto Rico was still without power Wednesday, more than a month after the storm, but wealthier residents are sealed up in air-conditioned homes with their generators and bottled water, or have fled the island altogether for extended vacations, while the poorest are left swatting mosquitoes in sweltering heat and trying to secure enough water.

“I have no money. I can’t hear very well. It’s too hard for me to try to go find another place so I am here waiting for my sister to find me,” said Efrain Diaz Figueroa, 70, who sleeps under a shard of tin on a damp mattress in the wreckage of his sister’s home, batting away swarms of mosquitoes in the punishing heat. A sign nearby reads: “Don’t rob us.”

Puerto Rico has some of the highest income inequality in the world, said Jose Caraballo, president of Puerto Rico Economists Association. More than 40 percent of the island lives below the poverty line, and tens of thousands are now out of work. Life for them is only getting worse.  

“Maria just exacerbated the inequalities we were seeing in Puerto Rico, especially among those in the metropolitan area and those in the country,” he said.

The U.S. territory of 3.4 million people was already struggling with a more than decade-long recession before the storm, working to restructure a portion of its $73 billion public debt. The median annual income is $19,500, while in the rest of the U.S. it’s more than $58,000.

The line between poverty and the middle class was already blurring. More than a dozen families a day were losing homes to foreclosure. Unemployment was at 10 percent, nearly three times the rate in the mainland.

“And then Maria happened. And now those people are living like the homeless. They don’t have a roof, they don’t have water, they are caring about more basic things such as food,” Caraballo said.

The Category 4 storm was among the most devastating the U.S. territory has ever seen, killing more than 50 people. It ripped up giant trees, wiped out power to the entire island, demolished scores of homes and badly damaged thousands more. About 70 percent of people now have water, but still must boil it or treat it to make it safe to drink. Governor Ricardo Rossello has pledged to get 95 percent of power back by Dec. 31; right now, about 30 percent have electricity.

Post-storm life

Some parts of the island feel practically normal: In upscale parts of San Juan, organic markets are stocked with cold, fresh produce and water, though some still limit the number of bottles you can buy. Generators whir outside restaurants and apartment buildings. Lights flicker on in the evenings among the high-rises. People walk their dogs on cleared streets, jog wearing expensive gym clothes in the early morning and go out for dinner in partially lit restaurants.

“We’re doing OK, all things considered,” said Jesus Gonzalez, 43. Like many, the generator in his building runs during the evening, the cost of which is split among the tenants. They have access to laundry machines, so he doesn’t mind sweating at the gym.

When the generators broke at the home of Dr. Linette Perez in the upscale suburb of Guaynabo, she and her husband and son went to a luxury hotel for three days to get some relief. Her home suffered minor damage; her beach house was worse. The family is thinking of leaving for the states, like tens of thousands of others already have.

“The generator exploded because we used it so much,” she said as her 7-year-old, Gustavo, swam in a clear, cold pool. “We couldn’t get another right away big enough for the house so we came to relax.”

But life is increasingly desperate for others, especially outside of the city where it’s been more difficult for aid workers to reach families cut off by fallen bridges and mudslides. Hours are longer because they are washing clothes by hand, hunting for food and water, and spending any free time cleaning up the wreckage of their homes.

Near Vega Baja, a mountain town about 25 miles (40 kilometers) west of San Juan, 63-year-old Dolores Gonzales still spends hours every day looking for water, driving along a treacherous stretch of mountain road obscured by downed trees and giant power poles. She’s collected rainwater, and uses nearby stream water for washing clothes, but she fears it.

“The close water is full of dead animals and debris,” she said. “I’m scared to use it to bathe. I don’t want an infection.”

Her grandson Emanuel Ramos has been out of work since the storm, and his family of four small children is staying with her in their leaky, moldy home.

“It’s impossible to find work right now. We’re living in the dark ages out here,” said Ramos, 27.

Making ends meet

The government is the island’s biggest employer, while other major jobs are in manufacturing, primarily in pharmaceuticals, textiles and electronics. But modern business depends on power and communication networks.

In Caguas, businessman Ricky Canto has no power or potable water, and family members are staying at his home. But the 54-year-old has a portable distillery that cleans water from his pool and a massive generator that costs him upward of $500 a week. Canto, who drives a $250,000 silver Ferrari, can afford it. But he knows his workers can’t.

“We have to get the systems up and running soon,” he said. “People need to work.”

Some like Moises Valentin, 63, have been recycling cans to make ends meet, picking through mountains of stinking, rotten trash. He had so much damage to his roof that his small apartment was ruined. He wept as he stood among his destroyed belongings, piled high, as members of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers built him a temporary roof.

“I did not feel poor until after Maria,” he said.

Санкції США щодо Ірану запровадили тільки проти «діяльності на дестабілізацію» – держсекретар

Державний секретар США Рекс Тіллерсон заявив, що санкції Вашингтона щодо Тегерана спрямовані тільки проти «діяльності Ірану на дестабілізацію», але не проти іранського народу і не проти «законної» ділової діяльності Ірану й інших країн.

Як сказав він під час перебування з візитом в Індії, мета США – не допустити можливостей фінансування такої «лихої поведінки», маючи на увазі ракетну програму Ірану, і зірвати таку діяльність, а також перешкодити «експортові озброєнь терористичним організаціям» (на кшталт ліванського шиїтського збройного руху «Хезболла») і залученню Ірану в конфлікти в Сирії і Ємені.

«Ми не боремося проти іранського народу… Ми не погоджуємося з діями «революційного» режиму», – сказав Тіллерсон.

Так само, сказав він у відповідь на запитання про плани Індії інвестувати сотні мільйонів доларів в іранський порт Чабагар, Вашингтон не має на меті перешкоджати «законній діловій діяльності», а цей інвестиційний проект ніяк не суперечить санкціям США.

При цьому, додав Тіллерсон, США будуть намагатися надати підтримку «новітнім голосам усередині Ірану».

США різко критикують Іран за його програму створення балістичних ракет. Здійснювати цю програму Рада безпеки ООН раніше забороняла Тегеранові, та за умовами «ядерної угоди» 2015 року цю заборону зняли, і міжнародні санкції, запроваджені було через цю програму, зняли. Але США стверджують, що Іран своєю ракетною програмою, не порушуючи самої «ядерної угоди», тим не менше, порушує «дух» цієї угоди, і запроваджують проти Ірану все нові санкції через цю програму.

French Film Institute Goes Ahead With Polanski Retrospective

France’s famed film institute La Cinematheque Francaise says it will go ahead with a retrospective of works by director Roman Polanski despite opposition by feminist groups.

 

La Cinematheque said Wednesday that calls to cancel the Polanski screenings – attended by the director – only began “in the last few days” as the sexual harassment accusations against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein gained force. The statement said it would not change the program that begins Monday.

 

Weinstein denies the allegations.

 

The institute said its role was not to moralize – in regard to the Polish-born director who in the 1970s pleaded guilty to having sex in the U.S. with a 13-year-old girl whom he plied with champagne and Quaaludes.

 

Since Polanski fled the U.S., he mostly has lived in Paris.

 

Поліція заявляє про затримання групи осіб на Київщині за підозрою у шантажі забудовників

На Київщині провели обшуки і затримали групу осіб за підозрою у вимаганні коштів у забудовників в особливо великих розмірах, повідомляють у Департаменті захисту економіки Нацполіції. За словами речниці департаменту Наталії Калиновської, обшуки проводились в рамках одного провадження.

«Обшуки проводились як на території Києва, так і на території області. І крім того, що проводився ряд санкціонованих обшуків, були затримані учасники злочинної групи, які займалися шантажем забудовників», – сказала вона у коментарі Радіо Свобода.

Як повідомляється на сайті Національної поліції, затримані підозрюються у тому, що вимагали гроші у компаній-забудовників за те, що не будуть протестувати проти проведення ними будівельних робіт.

«Поліцейські задокументували і факт вимагання та одержання від одного з забудовників 200 тисяч доларів США», – йдеться у повідомленні.

Раніше громадська активістка із ініціативи «Захисти ліс» Валентина Аксьонова, яка виступає проти забудови Вумівського лісу на Київщині, заявила про обшуки у її квартирі, у садибі її матері, а також у помешканнях інших активістів – Олександра Сінчугова та Юрія Єфремова, зокрема. Аксьонова надала у розпорядження Радіо Свобода копію ухвали суду від 24 жовтня про дозвіл на ці обшуки в рамках провадження за статтею про вимагання грошей. Водночас, за інформацією активістки, нікого з представників ініціативи «Захисти ліс» 25 жовтня не затримали.

Як повідомляла вона раніше у блозі на «Українській правді», ще в 2002 році 37,2 га лісів першої категорії Петропавлівсько-Борщагівська сільська рада перевела в категорію зелених насаджень, а дещо пізніше землю віддали під забудову. 

Протистояння активістів із Софіївської та Петропавлівської Борщагівкизабудовника BD Holding, який займається зведенням кількох житлових кварталів на Київщині, у судах відбувається уже більше року. У BD Holding заявляють, що отримали всі дозвільні документи законно і готові відстоювати свою правоту у суді.

Активісти повідомляли про тиск на них і погрози. Зокрема, у квітні цього року Велентина Аксьонова заявляла про підпал невідомими автомобіля під будинком її батьків. 

Russia Frees Two Pro-Kyiv Crimea Tatar Leaders from Jail

Russia has freed two prominent Crimean Tatar activists opposed to Moscow’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region, their lawyer said Wednesday.

Ukraine’s leader thanked Turkey’s president for helping broker the release.

Ilmi Umerov, deputy head of the Crimean Tatars’ semi-official Mejlis legislature before it was suspended by Moscow, was sentenced last month by a Russian court to two years in jail for separatism.

Ahtem Chiygoz, another Crimean Tatar leader, was sentenced at the same time to eight years for stirring anti-Russian protests.

“What everyone had been waiting for so long, has happened,” a defense lawyer for the Crimean Tatars, Nikolai Polozov, wrote on his Facebook page. “Two more hostages, two Ukrainian political prisoners have gained their freedom.”

There was no immediate confirmation of their release from Russian authorities.

The Tatars, a mainly Muslim Turkic community that makes up about 15 percent of Crimea’s population, have largely opposed Russian rule in the peninsula and say the 2014 annexation was illegal, a view supported by the West. They suffered mass deportation under Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

Nariman Dzhelyalov, a Crimean Tatar leader, told Reuters the two, Ilmi Umerov and Ahtem Chiygoz, had landed in Turkey.

“This is the result of Turkey’s talks with Russia with Ukraine’s participation,” he told Reuters.

“After Erdogan’s visit to Kyiv, representatives of Russian competent bodies turned up at Umerov’s house in Crimea to agree the terms [of the release].”

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko thanked Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan for his role in helping free the pair.

Moscow says the overwhelming majority of Crimeans voted to join Russia in a proper and fair referendum.

Western governments and human rights groups had alleged the two Crimean Tatar leaders were imprisoned for speaking out against Russia’s annexation of Crimea, and pressed Moscow to release them.

Umerov’s supporters said at the time that the two-year jail term handed to him actually amounted to a death penalty for the elderly man who suffers from Parkinson’s disease.

Russian officials denied the prosecutions were politically-motivated.

A U.N. human rights report said last month that Russia had committed grave human rights violations in Crimea, including its imposition of citizenship and deporting of prisoners. Moscow said it deemed those allegations “groundless.”

German Woman’s Letter to Man who Fled Nazis Stirs Memories

Peter Hirschmann has often recounted his own story of fleeing Germany as a teenager to escape Adolf Hitler’s persecution of the Jews, then joining the U.S. Army to fight the Nazis.

But the 92-year-old started to cry as he read a three-page letter, neatly printed in blue fountain pen, which arrived out of the blue from Nuremberg and stirred very different thoughts of his past.

 

Its author, Doris Schott-Neuse, told him how her grandfather had acquired Hirschmann’s family home under the Nazis, expressing her shame and imploring him for forgiveness.

 

Spurred to look into her family’s past after helping a friend dealing with traumatic issues related to her own, the 46-year-old civil servant was shocked to find the family narrative she’d believed for years was a half-truth at best, and felt compelled to reach out to the elderly man in Maplewood, New Jersey, near New York City.

“I am deeply ashamed for what us Germans did to yourself, your family and to your friends and relatives and to the members of the Nuremberg Jewish community,” she wrote. “It is hardly bearable to start thinking about the details — what a horror and nightmare it must have been to live through this.”

 

Included in the envelope were photos of the Hirschmann family home today.

 

“I teared up because it brought back to mind all of those memories of mine,” Hirschmann recalled in an interview.

 

___

 

The home is a stately building on the northeastern outskirts of Nuremberg, on Eichendorffstrasse 15.

 

“It was probably one of the nicer homes around according to the standards of the day,” Hirschmann said. “Of course things have changed; it wouldn’t rank as one of the great mansions that you would see, but at the time it was a really lovely place.”

 

Hirschmann fondly recalls helping tend his family’s fruit, vegetable and flower gardens.

 

He also remembers how his parents set up sprinklers for him and his friends after the Nazis came to power and steadily removed of Jewish rights — like at the local public pool.

 

“All of a sudden there was a sign up there: ‘Juden und Hunde Verboten,’ which means Jews and dogs not allowed,” he said.

 

Schott-Neuse has little memory of the home itself. Her aunt inherited it in 1969 after Schott-Neuse’s grandmother died, and Schott-Neuse was 5 when her aunt sold it. She has vague recollections of Easter egg hunting in the garden and her aunt’s small black-and-white television.

 

She didn’t know either of her grandparents, and she’d never asked a lot of questions. From her aunt, she learned a vague story about the house.

 

“She told me there were Jews who were the owners, who were able to escape to the United States and my grandparents helped them,” she recalled. “I don’t know if I want to believe that any longer. The letter was not only telling the family I was very sorry, but it was also searching for what was going on.”

 

___

 

The medieval Bavarian city of Nuremberg was an early Nazi hub. It was at a rally in 1935 that the Nazis announced what became known as the Nuremberg Laws — revoking the citizenship of Jews and excluding them from many walks of life.

 

At that time, Hirschmann’s father, Julius, was a successful businessman with a two-story, three-bedroom house in the suburbs.

 

By 1938, the so-called “Aryanization” process was in full swing, as Jewish businesses and properties were taken over by non-Jewish Germans, in the prelude to the full-scale mass murder of some 6 million European Jews several years later.

 

As Schott-Neuse combed through property registers in Nuremberg’s city archives, she uncovered documents showing how the Nazis had methodically and bureaucratically seized the Hirschmann’s home. By 1941, it was listed as being owned by by Muhr W., salesman.

 

Willi Muhr was Schott-Neuse’s grandfather.

 

“I thought he bought it directly from the Jewish owners but this doesn’t seem to be true,” she said.

 

Though she knows little about her grandfather, she assumes he must have had Nazi connections, since “it was a prime real estate area and you probably don’t get this really nice house with a large garden,” without any.

 

“That is what prompted me to write the letter, because I thought that the family also doesn’t know what happened and I wanted to say I’m so sorry, because it’s not done and over… there are Holocaust survivors still living,” she said.

 

After the war, Hirschmann’s family was paid restitution, though because of the depressed German housing market, it was a tenth of what the home had been worth before.

 

___

 

Peter Hirschmann and his family managed to safely flee Nazi Germany before the outbreak of war in September 1939. They ended up in Newark, New Jersey, and started over.

 

By the time Peter turned 18, the U.S. had entered the war. He signed a waiver allowing him to be drafted even though he was still a German citizen.

 

As a soldier with the 78th Infantry Division, he saw his first major action in Belgium in December 1944, in the Battle of the Bulge.

 

Like thousands of other Americans he was captured, but as a German Jew, he was in unique peril. When his captors found out he spoke German, he bluffed, saying he learned it in high school. He survived the final months of the war in a Nazi camp.

 

“If he had found out my background I would have been shot without any explanation,” he said.

 

He still chokes up remembering the young German soldier guarding him, who dug through his things and gave him a chocolate bar — and hope.

 

“He was my enemy, and he treated me like a human being,” Hirschmann said.

 

More than 70 years later, when he received Schott-Neuse’s letter, he accepted her overture without hesitation, telling her by email it was particularly touching “because it is obvious that you, too, are suffering and it pains me to think of that — you, who are blameless.”

 

He told her that it would have been easy for her to remain silent. The two have been corresponding regularly, but currently have no plans to meet face-to-face.

 

“You were not satisfied with that and examined the depths of your heart to reveal the era’s true impact. You had the option to ignore it and instead you confronted it,” he wrote. “My tears reflect the fervent hope that the humanity, dignity, and compassion you have shown is shared by others of your generation and the generations to follow.”

Iditarod Sled Dog Race Engulfed in Dog-doping Scandal

The world’s most famous sled dog race has become engulfed in a doping scandal involving a four-time champion’s team of huskies, giving animal rights activists new ammunition in their campaign to end the grueling, 1,000-mile Iditarod.

The governing board of the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race disclosed Monday that four dogs belonging to Dallas Seavey tested positive for a banned substance, the opioid painkiller Tramadol, after his second-place finish last March.

It was the first time since the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog race instituted drug testing in 1994 that a test came back positive.

Seavey strongly denied administering any banned substances to his dogs, suggesting instead that someone may have sabotaged their food, and race officials said he would not be punished because they were unable to prove he acted intentionally. That means he will keep his titles and his $59,000 in winnings this year.

But the finding was just the latest blow to the Iditarod, which has seen the loss of major sponsors, numerous dog deaths, attacks on competitors and pressure from animal rights activists, who say the huskies are often run to death or left bleeding and desperately ill.

“If a member of the Iditarod’s ‘royalty’ dopes dogs, how many other mushers are turning to opioids in order to force dogs to push through the pain?” People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said in a statement Tuesday.

It added: “This doping scandal is further proof that this race needs to end.”

“The race is all about winning and getting to the finish line despite the inhumane treatment towards the dogs,” said Fern Levitt, director of the documentary Sled Dogs.

Earlier this year, the Anchorage-to-Nome trek lost a major corporate backer, Wells Fargo, and race officials accused animal rights organizations of pressuring the bank and other sponsors with “manipulative information” about the treatment of the dogs.

Five dogs connected to this year’s race died, bringing total deaths to more than 150 in the Iditarod’s 44-year history, according to PETA’s count. And last year, two mushers were attacked by a drunken man on a snowmobile in separate assaults near a remote village. One dog was killed and others were injured. The attacker was given a six-month sentence.

Seavey won the Iditarod in 2012, 2014, 2015 and 2016. He finished second this year to his father, Mitch, and has had nine straight top-10 finishes.

Dogs are subject to random testing before and during the race, and the first 20 teams to cross the finish line in Nome are all automatically tested.

Latest controversy

“I have never given any banned substance to my dogs,” the 30-year-old Seavey said in a video posted on his Facebook page. He said that security is lax along the route and that someone might have tampered with his dogs’ food.

He added that he wouldn’t be “thrown under the bus” by the race’s governing board and that he has withdrawn from the 2018 race in protest.

Seavey said he expects the Iditarod Trail Committee to ban him from the race for speaking out. Mushers are prohibited from criticizing the race or sponsors.

Iditarod spokesman Chas St. George said that decision would be up to the committee’s board of directors.

The committee decided to release the name of the offending musher on Monday after scores of competitors demanded it do so. Race officials initially refused to do so because, they said, it was unlikely they could prove the competitor acted intentionally and because a lawyer advised them not to make the name public.

At the time of this year’s race, the rule essentially said that to punish a musher, race officials had to provide proof of intent. That rule has since been changed to hold mushers liable for any positive drug test unless they can show something happened beyond their control.

Wade Marrs, president of the Iditarod Official Finishers Club, said he doesn’t believe Seavey intentionally administered the drugs to his animals. Marrs said he believes the musher has too much integrity and brains to do such a thing.

“I don’t really know what to think at the moment,” Marrs said. “It’s a very touchy situation.”

Чільний діяч ОБСЄ заявив, що відвідає Україну, щоб обговорити з її керівництвом ситуацію з освітнім законом

Верховний комісар ОБСЄ у справах меншин Ламберто Дзаннієр заявив міністрові закордонних справ Угорщини Петерові Сійярто, що незабаром відвідає Україну, щоб особисто обговорити з українським керівництвом ситуацію навколо нового українського закону про освіту, повідомляє кореспондент Радіо Свобода.

За словами Сійярто, Дзаннієр висловив свою стурбованість ситуацією, що склалася. Угорський політик сказав, що на попередніх зустрічах із українськими високопосадовцями цей міжнародний дипломат порушував це питання, постійно слідкує за розвитком ситуації і «тримає її на порядку денному».

Обидва зустрілися раніше 24 жовтня в Палермо в Італії, де на полях конференції ОБСЄ з питань середземноморського партнерства вони вели мову про освітній закон України.

Зі свого боку, українська сторона веде двосторонні консультації і з представниками угорської нацменшини в Україні, і з владою Угорщини про механізм імплементації закону про освіту. Раніше, 20 жовтня, міністр закордонних справ України Павло Клімкін, виступаючи з трибуни сесійної зали Верховної Ради, наголосив, що над імплементацією нового закону про освіту, включно з «мовною статтею», працюватимуть спільно з Угорщиною, а до висновків Венеційської комісії щодо цього закону змін до нього не буде.

Інформацію підтвердив і перший заступник міністра освіти і науки України Володимир Ковтунець під час години запитань до уряду у Верховній Раді.

Український закон «Про освіту» набув чинності 28 вересня. Норма закону щодо мови освіти, державної, викликала критику в деяких колах в Україні і за кордоном. Там найгучніше протестує Угорщина, яка заявляла про свої намагання винести цю норму на розгляд Європейського союзу і блокувати через неї в ЄС усі євроінтеграційні кроки стосовно України.

Україна наголошує, що мовна стаття закону про освіту відповідає європейським практикам, а сам закон є законом рівних можливостей для всіх учнів, яких досі були позбавлені представники меншин через погане знання державної мови. Крім того, цю статтю надіслали на експертний розгляд до Венеційської комісії Ради Європи.

US to Intensify Refugee Screening, as Partial Ban Expires

A four-month review of the U.S. refugee program authorized under President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting travel ended Tuesday, re-opening the door to refugees from all countries, but with new vetting measures on the horizon.

The State Department and Department of Homeland Security, have yet to announce the details of the new screening measures.

Citing administration officials, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday the government will require additional biographical data and a more extensive review of refugees’ social media accounts prior to their acceptance.

Executive orders don’t stop refugees

Thousands of refugees have entered the United States, despite Trump’s two executive orders attempting to halt the program.  Lawsuits stymied the initial roll-out of the temporary ban.  Later, the U.S. Supreme Court determined arrivals could continue as long as the refugees could demonstrate “bona fide” close family ties to the country.

The House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hear from the top officials in charge of the refugee programs within the State Department, DHS and the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement on Capitol Hill this Thursday.

In addition to the forthcoming vetting changes, the Trump administration last month announced it would drop the ceiling on refugee arrivals for the 2018 Fiscal Year to 45,000, the lowest limit ever set for the program.

During the last months of then-President Barack Obama’s tenure in late 2016 and 2017, the U.S. refugee program — the most robust resettlement program in the world — was on track to receive 110,000 refugees in the 2017 fiscal year, amid increasing demand for safe third-country relocation stemming from the Syrian civil war and Islamic State violence.

Trump insisted, first as a candidate then as president, the refugee vetting system was inadequate, despite academic studies showing few links to refugees and fatal attacks in the United States. The country’s refugee program has overseen the arrivals of more than three million displaced people since 1975.

More Christians

Under the new administration, the refugee program has changed in other ways — including a shift back to accepting more Christians than Muslims, the two leading religions for arrivals since the early 2000s, according to a review of State Department data by VOA.

In 2016, a push to welcome more Syrian refugees bolstered the number of Muslims arrivals to the top spot for only the second time since that demographic data was made publicly available in 2002. Of the nearly 85,000 refugees who arrived between Oct. 1, 2015 and Sept. 30, 2016, 46 percent were Muslims, and 44 percent were Christian.

For the fiscal year that ended last month, however, Christians accounted for 47 percent of the approximately 54,000 refugees who entered the United States; whereas Muslim refugee arrivals dropped slightly to 43 percent during the same period, which included the transition of power from Obama to Trump in January.

Trump has prioritized changes to U.S. immigration and deportation systems since taking office.  In addition to limiting refugees, his administration has issued three variations of the travel ban affecting specific countries, ended the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, and ordered the hiring of 15,000 more immigration and border protection agents.

 

US House Republicans Open New Clinton Probes

Nearly a year after Donald Trump won the U.S. presidency, Republican lawmakers in the House of Representatives say they are opening new investigations into controversies linked to the challenger he defeated, Democrat Hillary Clinton.

House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte and Oversight Committee chief Trey Gowdy said they would probe how the Federal Bureau of Investigation reached its conclusion that Clinton was “extremely careless” in her handling of classified material in emails while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013, but that no criminal charges were warranted.

Meanwhile, House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes said he was opening an investigation into the complex 2013 sale of about 20 percent of the U.S. uranium assets to Russia at a time when Clinton’s State Department was one of nine U.S. government agencies that reviewed foreign investments in the United States.

Clinton has on numerous occasions faulted herself for deciding to use a private email server based in her New York home while she served as the top U.S. diplomat.

But more recently she has cited the FBI’s reopening of the email investigation less than two weeks before last November’s election as one of the reasons Trump defied predictions and pulled off one of the most stunning upsets in American political history. Trump defeated her even though two days before Election Day, investigators said they had found nothing new in the email probe and again cleared her of wrongdoing.

Goodlatte and Gowdy, in announcing their probe, said “decisions made by the Department of Justice in 2016 have led to a host of outstanding questions that must be answered” about the Clinton email investigation.

The lawmakers said they want to know why then FBI Director James Comey in July 2016 announced the agency’s conclusion about the Clinton investigation, but never announced it also was investigating possible Trump campaign links to Russian interests. That criminal investigation is still going on, now headed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, another former FBI chief who took over the probe after Trump fired Comey last May.

In addition, Goodlatte and Gowdy said they want to know why the FBI, rather than its parent agency, the Department of Justice, had discretion to make the decision to not charge Clinton. They also want to know the timeline of the FBI’s decision-making.

Uranium assets

The uranium company sale involves a major donor to the Clinton Foundation, the world charity run by Clinton, her husband, former President Bill Clinton and their daughter, Chelsea. The businessman, Frank Giustra, sold his uranium company, UrAsia, in 2007, to another company, Uranium One, which in turn sold a majority stake in the company in 2010 to Russia’s nuclear agency, Rosatom, which secured the U.S. mining rights four years ago.

“It’s important to learn why that deal went through,” said Republican Congressman Peter King of New York.

During the 2016 presidential race, Trump alleged that Clinton approved the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium assets to Russia at the same time as business executives linked to the deal were donating money to the Clinton Foundation.

Two years ago, Clinton said, “I was not personally involved [in reviewing the sale] because that wasn’t something the secretary of state did.”

Last week, Trump, in a Twitter comment, accused the national news media in the U.S. of ignoring the controversy over the uranium sale, including Clinton’s role and that of the administration of former President Barack Obama.

Some Democrats in the House said the two new probes are an attempt by Republicans to divert attention from investigations into Trump campaign links to Russia and whether Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey at a time when he was heading the FBI’s Russia investigation.

Міністр оборони Росії заявив про звільнення від екстремістів у Сирії території, втричі більшої за всю країну

Міністр оборони Росії Сергій Шойгу заявив, що за час російської воєнної кампанії в Сирії там від бойовиків екстремістського угруповання «Ісламська держава» була визволена територія, названа ним площа якої втричі більша за всю територію Сирії.

Як сказав Шойгу в перебігу візиту до Філіппін, за два роки внаслідок дій російських Військово-космічних сил у Сирії «ліквідовані 948 тренувальних таборів, 666 заводів і майстерень для виробництва боєприпасів, півтори тисячі одиниць військової техніки терористів, звільнені 998 міст і населених пунктів, звільнена площа становить 503 тисяч 223 квадратні кілометри». Ці його слова широко навели державні російські засоби інформації.

Офіційна загальна площа всієї Сирії, наведена в довідниках, – 185 тисяч 180 квадратних кілометрів.

Росія понад два роки тому втрутилася у громадянську війну в Сирії, ставши на боці режиму президента Башара аль-Асада, – офіційно для допомоги в боротьбі проти угруповання «Ісламська держава» своїми повітряними ударами. При цьому, як випливало з повідомлень самих російських військових, чимала частка цих ударів завдавалася по територіях, де діяла не «Ісламська держава», а інші супротивники режиму, в тому числі ті, що мають підтримку Заходу і арабського світу. Останнім часом російські війська, а також неофіційно російські приватні військові компанії, в Сирії дедалі більше беруть безпосередню участь у наземних бойових операціях, що призвело до різкого зростання числа жертв серед росіян у цій країні.

У першу чергу завдяки втручанню Росії під контроль сирійських урядових військ повернулася значна територія, яку раніше захопило угруповання «Ісламська держава». Також урядові війська захопили чималі території, що їх контролювали інші супротивники режиму.

Водночас приблизно такі самі за площею території в Сирії визволили від бойовиків «Ісламської держави» також інші учасники сирійського конфлікту – підтримувані Заходом, арабським світом і міжнародною коаліцією з понад 60 країн під проводом США формування сирійської опозиції.

Russia Vetoes UN Resolution to Extend Syria Gas Attacks Probe

Russia used its U.N. veto Tuesday to block a resolution extending the mandate of the investigators probing chemical weapons attacks in Syria.

In a Security Council vote, 11 countries supported extending the mission for another year, while Russia and Bolivia voted against the measure, and China and Kazakhstan abstained.

The investigating team, known as the Joint Investigative Mechanism or JIM, is expected to make public a report on Thursday that could identify the party responsible for a deadly April 4 attack in the rebel-controlled town of Khan Sheikhoun in southern Idlib that killed and sickened scores of civilians.

Three days later, the United States launched an airstrike on a Syrian air base which Washington accused the regime of Bashar al-Assad of having used to launch the poison gas attack.

Accountability

While the question of whether sarin or a sarin-like substance is not disputed, who used it still has to be officially confirmed, and it is anticipated the JIM’s report could shed light on the matter.

It would be politically embarrassing for Russia, a staunch ally of President Assad, if evidence shows that the regime — and not, for example, Islamic State militants — are responsible for the attack. In Syria, the government is the only party to the conflict that possesses air capabilities. Russia has previously suggested that the gas was released from a bomb on the ground and not in the air.

Russia’s U.N. envoy, Vassily Nebenzia, first sought to postpone Tuesday’s vote through a procedural measure until after the release of the JIM’s report, saying the hastily-called vote was an effort by Washington to embarrass Moscow.

“You need to show up Russia and show that Russia is guilty of not extending the JIM, in fact you are the one who is begging for confrontation,” Nebenzia said of the U.S. delegation, which drafted the text and pushed for the vote.

While the procedural vote had the support of China, Kazakhstan and Bolivia, it fell short of the required eight-vote majority and failed to prevent the other vote going ahead, forcing Russia to use its veto.

Eighth veto on Syria

“I want to underscore that today’s voting is senseless also, because it won’t have any impact on the future of the JIM,” Nebenzia said after casting his veto — the eighth time Russia has done so on Syria. “We will return to the issue of extension in the future — we have not stopped it.”

The mission’s mandate does not expire until November 16, so the council has three weeks to approve an extension without disrupting the team’s work, as happened last year when consensus could not be reached on the JIM’s extension.

“The question we must ask ourselves is, whether the JIM is being attacked because it has failed in its job to determine the truth in Syria, or because its conclusions have been politically inconvenient for some council members,” said U.S. envoy Michele Sison.

“Russia called for the formation of the JIM, they negotiated its terms, they agreed its mission, and yet when faced with the prospect of the JIM revealing the truth, why has Russia alone chosen to shoot the messenger?” asked British Ambassador Matthew Rycroft.

Some diplomats said the move for the vote now was intended to avoid politicizing whatever conclusions the report draws and avoiding having them affect votes for the extension.

All council members expressed the hope that they could return to the issue and reach consensus on extending the JIM’s mandate before it expires next month.

Генпрокурор Росії попросив США почати кримінальну справу проти інвестора Браудера

Генеральний прокурор Росії Юрій Чайка повідомив, що нещодавно попросив Сполучені Штати Америки почати кримінальну справу проти інвестора Вільяма Браудера, з ініціативи якого США свого часу ухвалили так званий «акт Магнітського» про санкції проти російських порушників прав людини, листом до міністра юстиції США Джеффа Сешнза.

Іншим листом російський генпрокурор закликав США перевірити обґрунтованість ухвалення самого «акту Магнітського». За словами Чайки, які транслювало російське державне телебачення, цей закон був ухвалений «виключно через подання кримінальних осіб».

Напередодні, 22 жовтня, західні засоби інформації повідомили, що Росія змогла внести ім’я Браудера в перелік осіб, яких розшукує Інтерпол, самочинно, без узгодження з Секретаріатом Міжнародної організації кримінальної поліції; після цього сам інвестор, громадянин Великої Британії, повідомив 22 жовтня, що США скасували йому дозвіл на в’їзд до країни, через що він того дня не зміг потрапити на літак до США, та відразу по тому у США заявили, що після кроку Росії електронний дозвіл Браудерові на в’їзд додатково підтвердили як чинний іще 18 жовтня. Відтак сам Браудер заявив, що тепер треба ще «виправити ситуацію з фальшивим ордером Інтерполу».

У Росії Вільяма Браудера ще 2013 року заочно засудили до дев’яти років позбавлення волі, визнавши винним в уникненні сплати податків; нині щодо нього триває ще один заочний судовий процес за схожими звинуваченнями. Браудер неодноразово відкидав ці звинувачення як безпідставні і політично мотивовані. Інтерпол раніше чотири рази відкидав спроби Росії внести Браудера до списків для розшуку.

Перед тим, 2012 року, у США ухвалили, зокрема, з ініціативи Браудера, так званий «акт Магнітського» – закон про санкції проти російських посадовців, яких вважають винними в порушенні прав людини. 2016 року дію цього закону поширили й на посадовців інших країн за такі порушення; схожі закони про санкції проти порушників прав людини, зокрема, в Росії, ухвалила ще низка держав.

Закон отримав назву за іменем Сергія Магнітського, російського юриста, який працював для інвестиційного фонду Вільяма Браудера в Росії. Він повідомив, що викрив схему, за якою посадовці Міністерства внутрішніх справ, податкової адміністрації та інших державних органів Росії викрали з російського державного бюджету суму у 230 мільйонів доларів – податки, сплачені фондом. По цьому він потрапив за ґрати за звинуваченням у тому, ніби він розробив для фонду схему уникнення сплати податків. 2009 року Магнітський помер у слідчому ізоляторі в Москві у віці 37 років від серцевих проблем. Російські правозахисники стверджують, що представники влади свідомо ігнорували поганий стан його здоров’я, щоб змусити його замовкнути.

Вільям Браудер свого часу був найбільшим портфельним інвестором у Росії, але ще 2005 року був змушений утекти з країни.

Turkey Puts More Rights Advocates on Trial, Raising International Concerns

A trial began in Istanbul Tuesday for eleven prominent human rights activists, including two foreign nationals, in a case that is drawing criticism from international human rights organizations who say it is part of a campaign by the government of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to silence criticism and scrutiny in Turkey in the wake of last year’s coup attempt.  

The defendants face prison sentences of up to 15 years in prison.

Amnesty International’s chairman in Turkey, Taner Kilic, and Idil Eser, Amnesty International’s Turkey director, are among those on trial. The case centers on a digital security seminar that was held on Buyukada, an island on the Sea of Marmara near  Istanbul, that focused on security and coping with stress. In a 15-page indictment, prosecutors allege the meeting was part of a conspiracy to unseat the government by inciting civil unrest

“It’s a completely baseless case, there is not a shred of evidence,” said Andrew Gardner, Amnesty International’s Turkey researcher. “It’s an attempt to scare and silence human rights civil society. That’s why Turkey’s most prominent human rights defenders and human rights organizations have been swept up in this case,” he said.

Key members of the Helsinki Citizens Assembly, one of Turkey’s most respected and oldest human rights groups, are among those on trial Tuesday.

Erdogan has vigorously defended the charges against the activists, portraying the case as an example that no one is above the law and evidence that Turkey faces a threat by international conspirators and unidentified countries following the failed coup. Erdogan on Tuesday lashed out at EU nations whose leaders have been critical of his crackdown and what they see as tightening controls on free speech.   “We expect European leaders to stop targeting Turkey and to return to common sense,” the Turkish leader said at an event in the capital, Ankara, on Monday.  

Mounting tensions with Europe

Tuesday’s trial is likely to further ratchet up tensions between Turkey and Europe. Two of the defendants are European nationals:  Swedish national Ali Gharavri and German Peter Steudtner, both of whom were giving seminars at the meeting where the human rights advocates were arrested.  German Chancellor Angela Merkel has strongly criticized the arrests, saying “Innocent people are caught up in the wheels of justice,” in Turkey.”

“Linking the work of Steudtner and other human rights activists, who are on trial with him, to the support of terrorism, to imprison and prosecute them, is highly absurd,” wrote European Parliamentarian Rebecca Harms in a statement released Tuesday. “The arbitrary detention of foreign citizens in Turkey proves to be more and more a measure by which the Turkish leadership wants to pressure the home countries of those concerned,” she said.

Under emergency rule introduced last year following the botched military coup, more than 50,000 people have been arrested and 150,000 others have lost their jobs.

Critics point to what they see as a lack of evidence to justify many of the prosecutions.

“If you look at the evidence, for example, against Idil Eser, Amnesty International’s director, it’s all to do with an Amnesty International campaign and public documents,” said Gardner. “The prosecutors have had three months of investigations to come up with evidence against human rights defenders and came up with nothing.”

Among the evidence against the defendants is a Tweet telling participants to turn off their phones and “enjoy the boat ride” to the island where the seminar was being held.

Courts as intimidation tool

There is a growing suspicion among observers that the trial is part of a campaign to intimidate wider civil society.

“The arrests of the human rights activists, I think, gives us a very bleak picture of the Turkish civic society, or what the regime means by ‘civic society,'” observes political scientist Cengiz Aktar. “It’s not very different from what we see in Russia, completely curtailed and diminished.”

Tuesday’s prosecution of human rights advocates comes amid a rash of arrests and trials of journalists. Media freedom groups have dubbed Turkey the world’s worst jailor of journalists, claiming more than 150 reporters are imprisoned.

On Tuesday, six more journalists went on trial for reporting on leaked emails that allegedly were written by Berat Albayrak, son-in-law of President Erdogan, and Turkey’s energy minister. The emails are considered to be in the public domain, yet observers note the journalists are being prosecuted for publishing state secrets.

The clampdown on media and freedom of expression is drawing further condemnation among Europeans already skeptical of Turkey’s readiness to continue its bid to some day join the EU.

“There cannot be an effective political debate when journalists cannot report or question political leaders without fear of harassment or arrest,” said Tanja Fajon, a Slovenian politician with the Social Democrats and member of the European Parliament. “As Turkey’s political situation worsens, it remains imperative to offer support to, and speak about, those imprisoned for their journalism.”

 

Aid Group Halts Sea Rescues in Mediterranean

The international aid group Save the Children is suspending its efforts to rescue migrants making the dangerous Mediterranean Sea crossing from Libya.

Tuesday, the organization said the combination of falling numbers of crossings and worsening security forced it to stop sending its ship, the Vos Hestia, out from its port in Italy.

Save the Children said the ship rescued as many as 10,000 migrants over the past year after the smugglers’ vessels they were in foundered at sea.

The announcement comes just a day after Italian authorities searched the Vos Hestia as part of Rome’s efforts to deter people smuggling across the Mediterranean. Save the Children said the decision to suspend operations wasn’t related to the search and it told journalists that Italian prosecutors had given assurances it is not under investigation. It seems the search might be linked, however, to crew members on the boat.

In August, police seized a boat operated by a German aid organization, saying there was evidence some people smugglers escorted migrants to that boat. Save the Children says it has nothing to do with that case.

Save the Children was one of the first aid groups to sign a voluntary code of conduct with the Italian government to ensure they aren’t colluding with or encouraging smuggling.

The number of arriving migrants is down about 25 percent so far this year from last year, to around 110,000. And the drop will get worse as the winter closes in. Very few rescue boats are heading out into the Mediterranean now because of falling need.

Tens of thousands of migrants from Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere have struggled to sail from Libya to Italy over the past few years. Hundreds of thousands of migrants have also trekked through Turkey to Europe.

Thousands have died in the sea crossing, prompting both rescue efforts by private aid groups and efforts by the Italian government to staunch the flow.

Rome, with the EU’s backing, has helped Libya with efforts to police its vast desert land borders and to patrol its coast to prevent migrants from entering.

Department of Justice Expands Fight Against MS-13 Street Gang

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday formally designated the El Salvador-based street gang known as MS-13 as a priority for a Department of Justice program that combats drug trafficking and money laundering.  

The designation will allow the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces to target MS-13 with an array of laws, from the anti-organized crime law known as RICO to tax and firearms statutes, Sessions told the International Association of Chiefs of Police.

“Now they will go after MS-13 with a renewed vigor and a sharpened focus,” Sessions said at the annual conference of IACP in Philadelphia.

Program’s mission

The Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces program is the centerpiece of the attorney general’s drug policy. Established in 1982 to combat drug trafficking and money laundering, it is comprised of Justice Department prosecutors as well as agents from 11 federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, DEA, IRS, the Secret Service and the Coast Guard.

“And they all have one mission: to go after drug criminals and traffickers at the highest levels,” Sessions said.

Based in El Salvador

With an estimated 30,000 members worldwide, including 10,000 in the United States, MS-13 is the only street gang designated by the Treasury Department as a transnational criminal organization.

The organization’s leaders are based in El Salvador, often directing members in the United States from prisons. Law enforcement officials say gang members operate in “cliques” in at least 40 states and engage in a wide range of criminal activity from illegal drug distribution to money laundering and a string of grisly homicides.

Monday’s announcement marks the latest step by the Department of Justice to fulfill President Donald Trump’s vow to root out MS-13. In February, Trump issued an executive order to “dismantle and eradicate” the transnational gang.

Justice Department’s motto

Repeating a refrain he’s often used as he’s promoted the Justice Department’s anti-gang campaign around the country, Sessions said that while MS-13’s motto is “kill, rape and control,” the Department has “a motto too: justice for victims and consequences for criminals.”

“This is our motto and that is our mission,” Sessions said, calling MS-13 the “most brutal of international gangs.”

Last month, the Department of Justice announced criminal charges against 3,800 members of MS-13, as well as another transnational gang — 18th Street — operating in the United States and Central America.

Американські сенатори Кардін і Маккейн виступили на підтримку Браудера

У США заступник голови міжнародного комітету Сенату демократ Бен Кардін і голова комітету з питань збройних сил, республіканець Джон Маккейн, виступили на підтримку Вільяма Браудера, британського підданого, засновника фонду Hermitage Capital. (Юристом цього фонду був Сергій Магнітський, який розкрив велику корупційну схему і помер у московському СІЗО у листопаді 2009 року).

Сенатори Кардін і Маккейн відзначили заслуги Браудера у боротьбі з корупцією у вищих ешелонах російської влади.

Влада США анулювала візу Вільяма Браудера. Це сталося після того, як Росія внесла його в базу Інтерполу, написав у мережі Twitter сам Браудер.

22 жовтня з’явилися повідомлення, що Росія з п’ятої спроби змогла внести Браудера до списку розшукуваних Інтерполом. Російська влада звинувачує главу фонду Hermitage Capital у фінансових махінаціях та ухиленні від сплати податків. Він був заочно арештований.

Сам Браудер висловив переконання, що його переслідування пов’язане зі справою загиблого в листопаді 2009 року в московському СІЗО юриста фонду Hermitage Capital Сергія Магнітського, який розкрив схему великих розкрадань із російського бюджету.

Браудер був одним із ініціаторів ухвалення у США «закону Магнітського», який передбачає візові та економічні санкції щодо росіян, причетних, на думку Вашингтона, до порушень прав людини. Минулого тижня до «акту Магнітського» приєдналася Канада. Президент Росії Володимир Путін назвав дії Оттави неконструктивними. За його словами, ця тема використовується на Заході для «роздмухування антиросійської істерії».

New Hampshire Governor Asks Trump to Stop Indonesian Deportation Effort

New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu on Monday publicly called on U.S. President Donald Trump, a fellow Republican, to halt an effort to deport 69 Indonesian Christians who fled violence in that country two decades ago and are living illegally in the state.

The group had been living near the state’s coast under the terms of a 2010 deal worked out with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that allowed them to remain so long as they handed in their passports and turned up for regular check-ins with immigration officials.

That changed starting in August when members of the group who arrived for scheduled meetings with ICE officials at the agency’s Manchester, New Hampshire, office were told to buy one-way plane tickets back to Indonesia, which they fled after 1998 riots that left about 1,000 people dead.

“I am respectfully requesting that your administration reconsider its decision to deport these individuals, and I urge a resolution that will allow them to remain in the United States,” Sununu said in a letter to Trump dated Friday, which his office made public Monday.

Several members of the group, who are all ethnic Chinese, told Reuters they fear that they would face discrimination or violence if they returned to the world’s largest majority-Muslim country.

“While I firmly believe that we must take steps to curb illegal immigration, it is also imperative that we make the process for legal immigration more streamlined and practical,” Sununu wrote.

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Immigration advocates have filed lawsuits in Boston on behalf of 47 members of the group asking a federal court judge to intervene.

Chief U.S. District Judge Patti Saris has ordered a stay to the deportations, but has indicated that she has little jurisdiction over immigration, which is handled by the Executive Office for Immigration review.

She is currently weighing whether she can order a longer delay to give the affected people, many of whom have U.S.-born children, time to renew their efforts to gain legal status.

Most of the group entered the United States legally on tourist visas following the riots, which erupted at the start of the Asian financial crisis. They overstayed their visas and failed to apply for asylum on time, but have been allowed to live openly under the accord with ICE, negotiated with the help of U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat.

Murder Trial Starts for Man Who Stoked US Immigration Debate

A murder trial started Monday for a Mexican man who set off a national immigration debate after he shot and killed a woman two years ago on a popular San Francisco pier.

Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, 54, has acknowledged shooting Kate Steinle in the back while she was walking with her father on the downtown pier on July 1, 2015.

But Garcia Zarate has said the shooting was accidental. He said he was handling a handgun he found wrapped in a T-shirt under a bench on the pier when it accidentally fired.

His lawyer told reporters before the trial started that his client was unaware that he had picked up a gun and that it went off as he unwrapped the T-shirt.

“He did not know the object in his hand was a gun,” attorney Matt Gonzalez said before he headed into the courtroom. “He does not bear criminal responsibility.”

Prosecutors have said that Zarate recklessly pointed the gun at people on the pier.

Garcia Zarate is charged with second-degree murder, which could result in a sentence of 15 years to life in prison. Assistant District Attorney Diana Garcia declined to comment on the case

Garcia Zarate had been deported five times and was homeless in San Francisco when he shot Steinle. He had recently completed a prison sentence for illegal re-entry when he was transferred to the San Francisco County jail to face a 20-year-old marijuana charge.

Prosecutors dropped that charge, and the San Francisco sheriff released Zarate from jail despite a federal immigration request to detain him for at least two more days for deportation. The sheriff’s department said it was following the city’s sanctuary policy of limited cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

The handgun belonged to a Bureau of Land Management ranger who reported that it was stolen from his parked car in San Francisco a week before Steinle was shot.

The shooting touched off a political furor during last year’s presidential race, with President Donald Trump referring during his campaign to Steinle’s death as a reason to toughen U.S. immigration policies.

Steinle’s mother and brother were attending the beginning of the trial.

Since being elected, Trump has threatened to withhold federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities such as San Francisco, several of which have filed lawsuits to prevent the move.

None of that is at issue during the trial, and the judge has barred mention of the politics of immigration and gun control during the proceedings.

Garcia Zarate originally went by the name Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez when he was arrested. But Gonzalez said he now prefers to be called by his birth name of Zarate.

У Чечні співробітник «Росгвардії» застрелив 4 товаришів по службі

У Чечні лейтенант «Росгвардії» застрелив чотирьох товаришів по службі.

За повідомленнями, лейтенант відкрив стрілянину у казармі і був убитий вогнем у відповідь. Ім’я нападника, як і причини його дій, наразі невідомі.Ведеться розслідування.

У жовтні минулого року у Москві був убитий співробітник «Росгвардії» – його застрелив товариш по службі Сергій Ручкін. У серпні 2017 року Ручкіна засудили до 11 років колонії. За версією слідства, засуджений навмисне підніс пістолет до скроні свого колеги і вистрілив. Сам Сергій Ручкін стверджує, що це «нещасний випадок».

Щорічно в армії Росії, за даними правозахисників, гинуть близько трьох тисяч військовослужбовців. Йдеться про «небойові» втрати.

Міністр оборони Японії назвав «критичною» загрозу з боку КНДР

Японський міністр оборони закликає США і Південну Корею вжити спільних заходів у відповідь на погрозами з боку Північної Кореї.

Ядерна загроза з боку Пхеньяна досягла критичного рівня і вимагає спільної реакції США, Японії і Південної Кореї, заявив 23 жовтня японський міністр оборони Іцунорі Онодера, який на Філіппінах проводить переговори з американським і південнокорейським колегами.

Міністр оборони США Джеймс Маттіс виступив стриманіше, критикувавши Північну Корею за нехтування резолюціями ООН, спрямованими проти ядерної і балістичної програм Пхеньяна.

Північна Корея неодноразово заявляла, що її ядерна програма не підлягає обговоренню, відкидаючи заклики США до відмови від ядерної зброї.

Напруження у відносинах між США і Пхеньяном посилюється з вересня, коли Північна Корея провела чергове, шосте за рахунком ядерне випробування.

UK Says its Democracy is Secure After Suggestion of Foreign Meddling in Brexit

Britain’s democracy is one of the most secure in the world and will remain so, a spokesman for Prime Minister Theresa May said on Monday in response to a question about a suggestion that there may have been foreign interference in the Brexit vote.

Opposition lawmaker Ben Bradshaw last week urged the government to look into reports by an advocacy group suggesting that the origin of some Brexit campaign funds was unclear.

Bradshaw said in parliament the issue should be investigated “given the widespread concern over foreign and particularly Russian interference in Western democracies.”

At a regular briefing with reporters, May’s spokesman was asked if the prime minister was concerned about the reports. “I am not aware of those concerns,” he said.

“More broadly, as we’ve always said, the UK democratic system is amongst one of the most secure in the world and will continue to be so.”

The Electoral Commission, which regulates political finance in Britain, said in April it was investigating campaign spending by pro-Brexit organization Leave.EU, without giving details.

A spokeswoman for the Electoral Commission said on Monday that investigation was still going on and it would not provide any further information until it was complete.

 

Loading...
X